BROS
Price
$72.94
Change
+$1.11 (+1.55%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.12B
64 days until earnings call
SG
Price
$8.82
Change
-$0.28 (-3.08%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.08B
64 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BROS vs SG

Header iconBROS vs SG Comparison
Open Charts BROS vs SGBanner chart's image
Dutch Bros
Price$72.94
Change+$1.11 (+1.55%)
Volume$18.73K
Capitalization9.12B
Sweetgreen
Price$8.82
Change-$0.28 (-3.08%)
Volume$47.53K
Capitalization1.08B
BROS vs SG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BROS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BROS vs. SG commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BROS is a StrongBuy and SG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (BROS: $71.83 vs. SG: $9.10)
Brand notoriety: BROS and SG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BROS: 103% vs. SG: 72%
Market capitalization -- BROS: $9.12B vs. SG: $1.08B
BROS [@Restaurants] is valued at $9.12B. SG’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $223.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BROS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BROS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BROS is a better buy in the long-term than SG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BROS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BROS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BROS is a better buy in the short-term than SG.

Price Growth

BROS (@Restaurants) experienced а +9.63% price change this week, while SG (@Restaurants) price change was -2.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

BROS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

SG is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.49% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BROS($9.12B) has a higher market cap than SG($1.08B). BROS YTD gains are higher at: 37.132 vs. SG (-71.616). BROS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 235M vs. SG (-29.06M). BROS has more cash in the bank: 254M vs. SG (168M). SG has less debt than BROS: SG (339M) vs BROS (981M). BROS has higher revenues than SG: BROS (1.45B) vs SG (686M).
BROSSGBROS / SG
Capitalization9.12B1.08B848%
EBITDA235M-29.06M-809%
Gain YTD37.132-71.616-52%
P/E Ratio156.15N/A-
Revenue1.45B686M212%
Total Cash254M168M151%
Total Debt981M339M289%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SG: Fundamental Ratings
SG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BROSSG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BROS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPTCX17.150.02
+0.12%
Virtus KAR Global Quality Dividend C
JMCVX16.43-0.01
-0.06%
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value T
SIMYX13.19-0.01
-0.08%
SEI Tax-Managed Intl Mgd Vol Y (SIMT)
JEMWX37.13-0.18
-0.48%
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity R6
MGNDX53.38-0.65
-1.20%
Praxis Growth Index A

BROS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BROS has been loosely correlated with CAVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BROS jumps, then CAVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BROS
1D Price
Change %
BROS100%
-3.25%
CAVA - BROS
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
SHAK - BROS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
FWRG - BROS
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
CMG - BROS
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
SBUX - BROS
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
More

SG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SG has been loosely correlated with CAVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SG jumps, then CAVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SG
1D Price
Change %
SG100%
-1.73%
CAVA - SG
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
CMG - SG
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
KRUS - SG
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.10%
SHAK - SG
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
BROS - SG
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.25%
More