BROS
Price
$53.08
Change
-$0.28 (-0.52%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.74B
39 days until earnings call
NATH
Price
$109.01
Change
+$2.26 (+2.12%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
445.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BROS vs NATH

Header iconBROS vs NATH Comparison
Open Charts BROS vs NATHBanner chart's image
Dutch Bros
Price$53.08
Change-$0.28 (-0.52%)
Volume$23.53K
Capitalization6.74B
Nathan's Famous
Price$109.01
Change+$2.26 (+2.12%)
Volume$23.54K
Capitalization445.8M
BROS vs NATH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BROS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BROS vs. NATH commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BROS is a Hold and NATH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BROS: $53.10 vs. NATH: $109.01)
Brand notoriety: BROS and NATH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BROS: 94% vs. NATH: 77%
Market capitalization -- BROS: $6.74B vs. NATH: $445.8M
BROS [@Restaurants] is valued at $6.74B. NATH’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $445.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BROS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNATH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BROS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NATH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than BROS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BROS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BROS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • NATH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the short-term than BROS.

Price Growth

BROS (@Restaurants) experienced а -9.42% price change this week, while NATH (@Restaurants) price change was +5.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

BROS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.27% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BROS($6.74B) has a higher market cap than NATH($446M). BROS has higher P/E ratio than NATH: BROS (115.43) vs NATH (18.93). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 40.663 vs. BROS (1.336). BROS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 235M vs. NATH (37M). BROS has more cash in the bank: 254M vs. NATH (26.9M). NATH has less debt than BROS: NATH (54.9M) vs BROS (981M). BROS has higher revenues than NATH: BROS (1.45B) vs NATH (150M).
BROSNATHBROS / NATH
Capitalization6.74B446M1,512%
EBITDA235M37M635%
Gain YTD1.33640.6633%
P/E Ratio115.4318.93610%
Revenue1.45B150M968%
Total Cash254M26.9M944%
Total Debt981M54.9M1,787%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NATH: Fundamental Ratings
NATH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13
SMR RATING
1..100
40
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BROSNATH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BROS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIVUX37.510.54
+1.46%
Macquarie Opportunity Instl
MLPSX91.660.93
+1.03%
ProFunds Mid Cap Value Svc
MGFAX9.990.02
+0.20%
MassMutual Global A
FSIDX18.09N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc I
ITGIX90.81N/A
N/A
VY® T. Rowe Price Growth Equity I

BROS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BROS has been loosely correlated with CAVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BROS jumps, then CAVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BROS
1D Price
Change %
BROS100%
-0.52%
CAVA - BROS
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
SHAK - BROS
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.92%
FWRG - BROS
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
CMG - BROS
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
SBUX - BROS
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
More

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with LOCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then LOCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
+2.12%
LOCO - NATH
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
BROS - NATH
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
RICK - NATH
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
CMG - NATH
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
SHAK - NATH
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
More