BROS
Price
$61.21
Change
+$2.27 (+3.85%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.78B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FAT
Price
$0.53
Change
-$0.09 (-14.52%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.28M
111 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BROS vs FAT

Header iconBROS vs FAT Comparison
Open Charts BROS vs FATBanner chart's image
Dutch Bros
Price$61.21
Change+$2.27 (+3.85%)
Volume$3.59M
Capitalization7.78B
FAT Brands
Price$0.53
Change-$0.09 (-14.52%)
Volume$612.2K
Capitalization11.28M
BROS vs FAT Comparison Chart in %
BROS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BROS vs. FAT commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BROS is a StrongBuy and FAT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BROS: $58.93 vs. FAT: $0.62)
Brand notoriety: BROS and FAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BROS: 17% vs. FAT: 101%
Market capitalization -- BROS: $7.78B vs. FAT: $11.28M
BROS [@Restaurants] is valued at $7.78B. FAT’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $11.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.14B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BROS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFAT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BROS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FAT is a better buy in the long-term than BROS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BROS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BROS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BROS and FAT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BROS (@Restaurants) experienced а +2.72% price change this week, while FAT (@Restaurants) price change was +11.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

BROS is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

FAT is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.04% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BROS($7.78B) has a higher market cap than FAT($11.3M). BROS YTD gains are higher at: 12.510 vs. FAT (-78.991). BROS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 235M vs. FAT (-34.51M). BROS has more cash in the bank: 254M vs. FAT (7.65M). BROS has less debt than FAT: BROS (981M) vs FAT (1.49B). BROS has higher revenues than FAT: BROS (1.45B) vs FAT (578M).
BROSFATBROS / FAT
Capitalization7.78B11.3M68,814%
EBITDA235M-34.51M-681%
Gain YTD12.510-78.991-16%
P/E Ratio124.92N/A-
Revenue1.45B578M251%
Total Cash254M7.65M3,321%
Total Debt981M1.49B66%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAT: Fundamental Ratings
FAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BROSFAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BROS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FOXA66.26-0.13
-0.20%
Fox Corp
MATX111.45-0.32
-0.29%
Matsons
ADSE12.24-0.04
-0.33%
Ads-Tec Energy PLC
TNON1.08-0.03
-2.70%
Tenon Medical Inc
AKA11.94-1.64
-12.08%
aka Brands Holding Corp

BROS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BROS has been loosely correlated with SHAK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BROS jumps, then SHAK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BROS
1D Price
Change %
BROS100%
-0.72%
SHAK - BROS
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
FRSH - BROS
50%
Loosely correlated
+3.12%
CAVA - BROS
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.45%
KRUS - BROS
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
CAKE - BROS
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
More

FAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FAT and DIN have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FAT and DIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAT
1D Price
Change %
FAT100%
+6.50%
DIN - FAT
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.32%
FATBB - FAT
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.37%
SBUX - FAT
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
FWRG - FAT
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
BROS - FAT
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
More