BROS
Price
$68.80
Change
+$2.72 (+4.12%)
Updated
Aug 11, 12:28 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.39B
86 days until earnings call
FAT
Price
$2.00
Change
-$0.03 (-1.48%)
Updated
Aug 11, 01:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
37.2M
80 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BROS vs FAT

Header iconBROS vs FAT Comparison
Open Charts BROS vs FATBanner chart's image
Dutch Bros
Price$68.80
Change+$2.72 (+4.12%)
Volume$2.3K
Capitalization8.39B
FAT Brands
Price$2.00
Change-$0.03 (-1.48%)
Volume$250
Capitalization37.2M
BROS vs FAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BROS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BROS vs. FAT commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BROS is a StrongBuy and FAT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (BROS: $66.08 vs. FAT: $2.03)
Brand notoriety: BROS and FAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BROS: 214% vs. FAT: 101%
Market capitalization -- BROS: $8.39B vs. FAT: $37.2M
BROS [@Restaurants] is valued at $8.39B. FAT’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $37.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BROS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFAT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BROS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BROS is a better buy in the long-term than FAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BROS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BROS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BROS is a better buy in the short-term than FAT.

Price Growth

BROS (@Restaurants) experienced а +16.52% price change this week, while FAT (@Restaurants) price change was -7.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

BROS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

FAT is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.42% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BROS($8.39B) has a higher market cap than FAT($37.2M). BROS YTD gains are higher at: 26.155 vs. FAT (-31.512). BROS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 210M vs. FAT (-34.51M). BROS has more cash in the bank: 316M vs. FAT (7.65M). BROS has less debt than FAT: BROS (1.02B) vs FAT (1.49B). BROS has higher revenues than FAT: BROS (1.36B) vs FAT (578M).
BROSFATBROS / FAT
Capitalization8.39B37.2M22,554%
EBITDA210M-34.51M-609%
Gain YTD26.155-31.512-83%
P/E Ratio143.65N/A-
Revenue1.36B578M235%
Total Cash316M7.65M4,132%
Total Debt1.02B1.49B68%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAT: Fundamental Ratings
FAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
39

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BROSFAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BROS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PDD114.260.07
+0.06%
PDD Holdings
ZUMZ14.71N/A
N/A
Zumiez
CVAC5.44-0.02
-0.37%
CureVac NV
FCFS134.44-0.64
-0.47%
FirstCash Holdings
MCVT5.99-0.18
-2.92%
Mill City Ventures III Ltd

BROS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BROS has been loosely correlated with CAVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BROS jumps, then CAVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BROS
1D Price
Change %
BROS100%
-5.96%
CAVA - BROS
42%
Loosely correlated
-4.33%
SHAK - BROS
38%
Loosely correlated
-5.85%
CMG - BROS
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.93%
FWRG - BROS
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
PBPB - BROS
33%
Loosely correlated
-3.61%
More

FAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FAT and GENK have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FAT and GENK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAT
1D Price
Change %
FAT100%
-0.98%
GENK - FAT
33%
Poorly correlated
-17.11%
RICK - FAT
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
DENN - FAT
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
DPZ - FAT
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
BROS - FAT
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.96%
More