BROS
Price
$68.80
Change
+$2.72 (+4.12%)
Updated
Aug 11, 12:28 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.39B
86 days until earnings call
CMG
Price
$41.84
Change
+$0.41 (+0.99%)
Updated
Aug 11, 12:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
55.57B
72 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BROS vs CMG

Header iconBROS vs CMG Comparison
Open Charts BROS vs CMGBanner chart's image
Dutch Bros
Price$68.80
Change+$2.72 (+4.12%)
Volume$2.3K
Capitalization8.39B
Chipotle Mexican Grill
Price$41.84
Change+$0.41 (+0.99%)
Volume$23.23K
Capitalization55.57B
BROS vs CMG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BROS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BROS vs. CMG commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BROS is a StrongBuy and CMG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (BROS: $66.08 vs. CMG: $41.44)
Brand notoriety: BROS: Not notable vs. CMG: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BROS: 214% vs. CMG: 136%
Market capitalization -- BROS: $8.39B vs. CMG: $55.57B
BROS [@Restaurants] is valued at $8.39B. CMG’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $55.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BROS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BROS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BROS is a better buy in the long-term than CMG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BROS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BROS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CMG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BROS is a better buy in the short-term than CMG.

Price Growth

BROS (@Restaurants) experienced а +16.52% price change this week, while CMG (@Restaurants) price change was -2.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

BROS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

CMG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.42% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMG($55.6B) has a higher market cap than BROS($8.39B). BROS has higher P/E ratio than CMG: BROS (143.65) vs CMG (36.67). BROS YTD gains are higher at: 26.155 vs. CMG (-31.277). CMG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.35B vs. BROS (210M). CMG has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. BROS (316M). BROS has less debt than CMG: BROS (1.02B) vs CMG (4.78B). CMG has higher revenues than BROS: CMG (11.6B) vs BROS (1.36B).
BROSCMGBROS / CMG
Capitalization8.39B55.6B15%
EBITDA210M2.35B9%
Gain YTD26.155-31.277-84%
P/E Ratio143.6536.67392%
Revenue1.36B11.6B12%
Total Cash316M1.55B20%
Total Debt1.02B4.78B21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMG: Fundamental Ratings
CMG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BROSCMG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BROS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PBQQ27.440.14
+0.52%
PGIM LADDERED NASDAQ-100 BUFFER 12 ETF
FNK52.530.24
+0.45%
First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX® ETF
AAA24.990.02
+0.08%
Alternative AccessFirstPriorityCLO BdETF
IGSB52.68-0.05
-0.09%
iShares 1-5 Year invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF
MYI10.50-0.03
-0.28%
Blackrock Muniyield Quality Fund III

BROS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BROS has been loosely correlated with CAVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BROS jumps, then CAVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BROS
1D Price
Change %
BROS100%
-5.96%
CAVA - BROS
42%
Loosely correlated
-4.33%
SHAK - BROS
38%
Loosely correlated
-5.85%
CMG - BROS
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.93%
FWRG - BROS
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
PBPB - BROS
33%
Loosely correlated
-3.61%
More

CMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMG has been loosely correlated with SG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMG jumps, then SG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMG
1D Price
Change %
CMG100%
-2.93%
SG - CMG
48%
Loosely correlated
-23.06%
WING - CMG
48%
Loosely correlated
-4.64%
KRUS - CMG
46%
Loosely correlated
-6.64%
TXRH - CMG
41%
Loosely correlated
-6.58%
SHAK - CMG
40%
Loosely correlated
-5.85%
More