BRLAF
Price
$5.19
Change
+$0.09 (+1.76%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
4.03B
MRVGF
Price
$1.50
Change
+$0.10 (+7.14%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.07B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRLAF vs MRVGF

Header iconBRLAF vs MRVGF Comparison
Open Charts BRLAF vs MRVGFBanner chart's image
British Land Company (The)
Price$5.19
Change+$0.09 (+1.76%)
Volume$781
Capitalization4.03B
Mirvac Group
Price$1.50
Change+$0.10 (+7.14%)
Volume$1.54K
Capitalization6.07B
BRLAF vs MRVGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRVGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRLAF vs. MRVGF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRLAF is a Hold and MRVGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BRLAF: $5.19 vs. MRVGF: $1.50)
Brand notoriety: BRLAF and MRVGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRLAF: 15% vs. MRVGF: 11%
Market capitalization -- BRLAF: $4.03B vs. MRVGF: $6.07B
BRLAF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $4.03B. MRVGF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $6.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRLAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMRVGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRLAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MRVGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRVGF is a better buy in the long-term than BRLAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRLAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRVGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRLAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MRVGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRVGF is a better buy in the short-term than BRLAF.

Price Growth

BRLAF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +1.78% price change this week, while MRVGF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.40% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRVGF($6.07B) has a higher market cap than BRLAF($4.03B). MRVGF has higher P/E ratio than BRLAF: MRVGF (8.69) vs BRLAF (6.28). BRLAF YTD gains are higher at: 24.484 vs. MRVGF (21.773). MRVGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -356M vs. BRLAF (-944M). MRVGF has more cash in the bank: 558M vs. BRLAF (125M). BRLAF has less debt than MRVGF: BRLAF (2.39B) vs MRVGF (4.29B). MRVGF has higher revenues than BRLAF: MRVGF (2.28B) vs BRLAF (418M).
BRLAFMRVGFBRLAF / MRVGF
Capitalization4.03B6.07B66%
EBITDA-944M-356M265%
Gain YTD24.48421.773112%
P/E Ratio6.288.6972%
Revenue418M2.28B18%
Total Cash125M558M22%
Total Debt2.39B4.29B56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRLAF vs MRVGF: Fundamental Ratings
BRLAF
MRVGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77100
SMR RATING
1..100
9397
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
979
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRVGF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BRLAF (72). This means that MRVGF’s stock grew similarly to BRLAF’s over the last 12 months.

BRLAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as MRVGF (100). This means that BRLAF’s stock grew similarly to MRVGF’s over the last 12 months.

BRLAF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as MRVGF (97). This means that BRLAF’s stock grew similarly to MRVGF’s over the last 12 months.

MRVGF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BRLAF (53). This means that MRVGF’s stock grew similarly to BRLAF’s over the last 12 months.

MRVGF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BRLAF (97). This means that MRVGF’s stock grew significantly faster than BRLAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRLAFMRVGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRVGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ERTH43.711.19
+2.80%
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
XPND33.950.49
+1.46%
First Trust Expanded Technology ETF
SEPM30.81N/A
N/A
FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Sep
IEO91.14-0.09
-0.10%
iShares US Oil & Gas Explor & Prod ETF
BITB59.48-0.26
-0.44%
Bitwise Bitcoin ETF

BRLAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRLAF has been loosely correlated with JRFIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRLAF jumps, then JRFIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRLAF
1D Price
Change %
BRLAF100%
N/A
JRFIF - BRLAF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HRUFF - BRLAF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRVGF - BRLAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTLCY - BRLAF
19%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
BTBIF - BRLAF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MRVGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MRVGF and DREUF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRVGF and DREUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRVGF
1D Price
Change %
MRVGF100%
N/A
DREUF - MRVGF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
MAPIF - MRVGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRLAF - MRVGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTLCY - MRVGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
REFI - MRVGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
More