BRKWF
Price
$17.61
Change
+$2.09 (+13.47%)
Updated
May 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.83B
HLBZF
Price
$226.86
Change
+$3.71 (+1.66%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.13B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRKWF vs HLBZF

Header iconBRKWF vs HLBZF Comparison
Open Charts BRKWF vs HLBZFBanner chart's image
Brickworks
Price$17.61
Change+$2.09 (+13.47%)
Volume$300
Capitalization2.83B
HEIDELBERG MATERIALS AG
Price$226.86
Change+$3.71 (+1.66%)
Volume$16
Capitalization15.13B
BRKWF vs HLBZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRKWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLBZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRKWF vs. HLBZF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRKWF is a Hold and HLBZF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BRKWF: $17.61 vs. HLBZF: $236.94)
Brand notoriety: BRKWF and HLBZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRKWF: 100% vs. HLBZF: 0%
Market capitalization -- BRKWF: $2.83B vs. HLBZF: $15.13B
BRKWF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $2.83B. HLBZF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $15.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRKWF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHLBZF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BRKWF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HLBZF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLBZF is a better buy in the long-term than BRKWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRKWF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLBZF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRKWF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • HLBZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLBZF is a better buy in the short-term than BRKWF.

Price Growth

BRKWF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HLBZF (@Construction Materials) price change was +2.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.75% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLBZF($15.1B) has a higher market cap than BRKWF($2.83B). BRKWF has higher P/E ratio than HLBZF: BRKWF (10.35) vs HLBZF (8.46). HLBZF YTD gains are higher at: 88.797 vs. BRKWF (5.134). HLBZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.77B vs. BRKWF (29.3M). HLBZF has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. BRKWF (187M). BRKWF has less debt than HLBZF: BRKWF (751M) vs HLBZF (8.71B). HLBZF has higher revenues than BRKWF: HLBZF (21.1B) vs BRKWF (1.14B).
BRKWFHLBZFBRKWF / HLBZF
Capitalization2.83B15.1B19%
EBITDA29.3M3.77B1%
Gain YTD5.13488.7976%
P/E Ratio10.358.46122%
Revenue1.14B21.1B5%
Total Cash187M1.75B11%
Total Debt751M8.71B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRKWF vs HLBZF: Fundamental Ratings
BRKWF
HLBZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5045
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78
SMR RATING
1..100
9386
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5437
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
117
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRKWF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as HLBZF (16). This means that BRKWF’s stock grew similarly to HLBZF’s over the last 12 months.

BRKWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as HLBZF (8). This means that BRKWF’s stock grew similarly to HLBZF’s over the last 12 months.

HLBZF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as BRKWF (93). This means that HLBZF’s stock grew similarly to BRKWF’s over the last 12 months.

HLBZF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as BRKWF (54). This means that HLBZF’s stock grew similarly to BRKWF’s over the last 12 months.

HLBZF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as BRKWF (11). This means that HLBZF’s stock grew similarly to BRKWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRKWFHLBZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
48%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRKWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLBZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VERU0.610.02
+3.94%
Veru
LAW4.540.08
+1.79%
CS Disco
COUR8.570.12
+1.42%
Coursera
KNSL476.163.03
+0.64%
Kinsale Capital Group
JCSE1.14N/A
N/A
JE Cleantech Holdings Limited

BRKWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRKWF and HLBZF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRKWF and HLBZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRKWF
1D Price
Change %
BRKWF100%
N/A
HLBZF - BRKWF
30%
Poorly correlated
+6.18%
WCHNF - BRKWF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBRBY - BRKWF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
BSND - BRKWF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBRBF - BRKWF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HLBZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLBZF and HDLMY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLBZF and HDLMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLBZF
1D Price
Change %
HLBZF100%
+6.18%
HDLMY - HLBZF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
BRKWF - HLBZF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCMLY - HLBZF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
FRCEF - HLBZF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCWOF - HLBZF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More