BRKL
Price
$12.65
Change
-$0.06 (-0.47%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
68 days until earnings call
RMBHF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

BRKL vs RMBHF

Header iconBRKL vs RMBHF Comparison
Open Charts BRKL vs RMBHFBanner chart's image
Brookline Ban
Price$12.65
Change-$0.06 (-0.47%)
Volume$518.59K
CapitalizationN/A
RMB Holdings
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$12.59K
CapitalizationN/A
BRKL vs RMBHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BRKL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRKL vs. RMBHF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRKL is a StrongBuy and RMBHF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (BRKL: $12.65 vs. RMBHF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: BRKL and RMBHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRKL: 83% vs. RMBHF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BRKL: $885.39M vs. RMBHF: $48.48M
BRKL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $885.39M. RMBHF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $48.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRKL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRMBHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BRKL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RMBHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRKL is a better buy in the long-term than RMBHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRKL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BRKL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BRKL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.63% price change this week, while RMBHF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRKL is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.80% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRKL($885M) has a higher market cap than RMBHF($48.5M). BRKL YTD gains are higher at: 21.070 vs. RMBHF (0.000). BRKL has more cash in the bank: 34.5M vs. RMBHF (17M). RMBHF has less debt than BRKL: RMBHF (1.04B) vs BRKL (1.41B). BRKL has higher revenues than RMBHF: BRKL (371M) vs RMBHF (54M).
BRKLRMBHFBRKL / RMBHF
Capitalization885M48.5M1,825%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.0700.000-
P/E Ratio11.41N/A-
Revenue371M54M687%
Total Cash34.5M17M203%
Total Debt1.41B1.04B136%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRKL: Fundamental Ratings
BRKL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
22
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95
SMR RATING
1..100
15
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRKL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BRKL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

BRKL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRKL has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BRKL jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRKL
1D Price
Change %
BRKL100%
-0.47%
UBSI - BRKL
87%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
CNOB - BRKL
84%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
BHLB - BRKL
83%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
RNST - BRKL
83%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
UCB - BRKL
83%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
More

RMBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBHF has been loosely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMBHF jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBHF
1D Price
Change %
RMBHF100%
N/A
NWG - RMBHF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HCBC - RMBHF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KISB - RMBHF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRKL - RMBHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
HFBL - RMBHF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More