BRKCF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
34.27M
WTRNF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
36.05M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRKCF vs WTRNF

Header iconBRKCF vs WTRNF Comparison
Open Charts BRKCF vs WTRNFBanner chart's image
Barksdale Resources
Price$0.08
Change-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Volume$76K
Capitalization34.27M
Western Resources
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization36.05M
BRKCF vs WTRNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRKCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRKCF vs. WTRNF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRKCF is a Hold and WTRNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BRKCF: $0.08 vs. WTRNF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: BRKCF and WTRNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRKCF: 66% vs. WTRNF: 127%
Market capitalization -- BRKCF: $34.27M vs. WTRNF: $36.05M
BRKCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $34.27M. WTRNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $36.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRKCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWTRNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRKCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WTRNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BRKCF and WTRNF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRKCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTRNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRKCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WTRNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WTRNF is a better buy in the short-term than BRKCF.

Price Growth

BRKCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -16.00% price change this week, while WTRNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTRNF($36M) and BRKCF($34.3M) have the same market capitalization . BRKCF YTD gains are higher at: -31.207 vs. WTRNF (-39.500). WTRNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.01M vs. BRKCF (-2.6M). WTRNF has more cash in the bank: 9.93M vs. BRKCF (3.27M). BRKCF has less debt than WTRNF: BRKCF (1.52M) vs WTRNF (90.1M). BRKCF (0) and WTRNF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BRKCFWTRNFBRKCF / WTRNF
Capitalization34.3M36M95%
EBITDA-2.6M2.01M-129%
Gain YTD-31.207-39.50079%
P/E RatioN/A19.11-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.27M9.93M33%
Total Debt1.52M90.1M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRKCF vs WTRNF: Fundamental Ratings
BRKCF
WTRNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9389
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6193
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10037
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRKCF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTRNF (61). This means that BRKCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTRNF’s over the last 12 months.

BRKCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WTRNF (100). This means that BRKCF’s stock grew similarly to WTRNF’s over the last 12 months.

WTRNF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as BRKCF (93). This means that WTRNF’s stock grew similarly to BRKCF’s over the last 12 months.

BRKCF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as WTRNF (93). This means that BRKCF’s stock grew similarly to WTRNF’s over the last 12 months.

WTRNF's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRKCF (100). This means that WTRNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRKCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRKCFWTRNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRKCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EAXR0.90N/A
N/A
EALIXIR INC.
IWSH0.16N/A
N/A
Wright Investors' Service Holdings , Inc.
ROHCF13.31N/A
N/A
Rohm Co. Ltd.
BTSDF1.26N/A
N/A
Health & Happiness International Holdings Ltd.
CAPMF154.01-1.90
-1.22%
Capgemini SE

BRKCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRKCF and WTRNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRKCF and WTRNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRKCF
1D Price
Change %
BRKCF100%
-11.58%
WTRNF - BRKCF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMTLF - BRKCF
2%
Poorly correlated
+29.94%
GRDAF - BRKCF
0%
Poorly correlated
-8.33%
BKUCF - BRKCF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
BRYGF - BRKCF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WTRNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTRNF has been loosely correlated with PMYLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTRNF jumps, then PMYLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTRNF
1D Price
Change %
WTRNF100%
N/A
PMYLF - WTRNF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SRCGF - WTRNF
27%
Poorly correlated
+12.68%
BRKCF - WTRNF
25%
Poorly correlated
-11.58%
SRCAF - WTRNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTRYF - WTRNF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More