BRKCF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
34.27M
GRDAF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRKCF vs GRDAF

Header iconBRKCF vs GRDAF Comparison
Open Charts BRKCF vs GRDAFBanner chart's image
Barksdale Resources
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.9K
Capitalization34.27M
Grounded Lithium
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.1K
CapitalizationN/A
BRKCF vs GRDAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRKCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRKCF vs. GRDAF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRKCF is a Hold and GRDAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BRKCF: $0.08 vs. GRDAF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: BRKCF and GRDAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRKCF: 4% vs. GRDAF: 3%
Market capitalization -- BRKCF: $34.27M vs. GRDAF: $0
BRKCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $34.27M. GRDAF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRKCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGRDAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRKCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GRDAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRKCF is a better buy in the long-term than GRDAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRKCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRDAF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRKCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GRDAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRKCF is a better buy in the short-term than GRDAF.

Price Growth

BRKCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +7.78% price change this week, while GRDAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRKCF YTD gains are higher at: -26.897 vs. GRDAF (-31.737).
BRKCFGRDAFBRKCF / GRDAF
Capitalization34.3MN/A-
EBITDA-2.6MN/A-
Gain YTD-26.897-31.73785%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash3.27MN/A-
Total Debt1.52MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRKCF vs GRDAF: Fundamental Ratings
BRKCF
GRDAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10097
SMR RATING
1..100
9494
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3757
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRKCF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as GRDAF (60). This means that BRKCF’s stock grew similarly to GRDAF’s over the last 12 months.

GRDAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as BRKCF (100). This means that GRDAF’s stock grew similarly to BRKCF’s over the last 12 months.

GRDAF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as BRKCF (94). This means that GRDAF’s stock grew similarly to BRKCF’s over the last 12 months.

BRKCF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as GRDAF (57). This means that BRKCF’s stock grew similarly to GRDAF’s over the last 12 months.

BRKCF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GRDAF (100). This means that BRKCF’s stock grew similarly to GRDAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRKCFGRDAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRKCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRDCY20.930.10
+0.48%
Bridgestone Corp.
HGMCF14.35N/A
N/A
Harmony Gold Mining Company Ltd.
BSFAF0.04N/A
N/A
BSF Enterprise Plc
FMCXF2.23-0.02
-0.89%
Foran Mining Corporation
DRRSF0.12N/A
-2.94%
Arianne Phosphate Inc

BRKCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRKCF and WTRNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRKCF and WTRNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRKCF
1D Price
Change %
BRKCF100%
N/A
WTRNF - BRKCF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMTLF - BRKCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRDAF - BRKCF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
BKUCF - BRKCF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-2.78%
BRYGF - BRKCF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GRDAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRDAF and MKNGF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRDAF and MKNGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRDAF
1D Price
Change %
GRDAF100%
-0.87%
MKNGF - GRDAF
30%
Poorly correlated
+36.87%
ABRMF - GRDAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
REMRF - GRDAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
BKUCF - GRDAF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.78%
BRYGF - GRDAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More