BRFH
Price
$2.85
Change
-$0.06 (-2.06%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
45.43M
66 days until earnings call
CCOJY
Price
$8.47
Change
-$0.13 (-1.51%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.98B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRFH vs CCOJY

Header iconBRFH vs CCOJY Comparison
Open Charts BRFH vs CCOJYBanner chart's image
Barfresh Food Group
Price$2.85
Change-$0.06 (-2.06%)
Volume$5.83K
Capitalization45.43M
Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan
Price$8.47
Change-$0.13 (-1.51%)
Volume$131
Capitalization2.98B
BRFH vs CCOJY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCOJY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRFH vs. CCOJY commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRFH is a Hold and CCOJY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BRFH: $2.85 vs. CCOJY: $8.47)
Brand notoriety: BRFH and CCOJY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRFH: 115% vs. CCOJY: 23%
Market capitalization -- BRFH: $45.43M vs. CCOJY: $2.98B
BRFH [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $45.43M. CCOJY’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $2.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $300.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $20.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRFH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCCOJY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRFH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CCOJY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCOJY is a better buy in the long-term than BRFH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRFH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CCOJY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRFH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CCOJY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BRFH and CCOJY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BRFH (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -0.50% price change this week, while CCOJY (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -1.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +369.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRFH is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-1.32% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCOJY($2.98B) has a higher market cap than BRFH($45.4M). CCOJY YTD gains are higher at: 6.541 vs. BRFH (-3.061).
BRFHCCOJYBRFH / CCOJY
Capitalization45.4M2.98B2%
EBITDA-2.78MN/A-
Gain YTD-3.0616.541-47%
P/E RatioN/A106.86-
Revenue10.8MN/A-
Total Cash1.87MN/A-
Total Debt200KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRFH vs CCOJY: Fundamental Ratings
BRFH
CCOJY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10088
SMR RATING
1..100
9991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6248
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10017
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRFH's Valuation (83) in the null industry is in the same range as CCOJY (96). This means that BRFH’s stock grew similarly to CCOJY’s over the last 12 months.

CCOJY's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as BRFH (100). This means that CCOJY’s stock grew similarly to BRFH’s over the last 12 months.

CCOJY's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as BRFH (99). This means that CCOJY’s stock grew similarly to BRFH’s over the last 12 months.

CCOJY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as BRFH (62). This means that CCOJY’s stock grew similarly to BRFH’s over the last 12 months.

CCOJY's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BRFH (100). This means that CCOJY’s stock grew significantly faster than BRFH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRFHCCOJY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCOJY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OMER4.410.29
+7.04%
Omeros Corp
ORCL248.283.32
+1.36%
Oracle Corp
PLTK3.630.04
+1.11%
Playtika Holding Corp
RVMD36.02N/A
N/A
Revolution Medicines
TURN4.42N/A
-0.05%
180 Degree Capital Corp

BRFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRFH and COCO have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRFH and COCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRFH
1D Price
Change %
BRFH100%
-1.93%
COCO - BRFH
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
CCEP - BRFH
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
CCOJY - BRFH
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCHGY - BRFH
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
KDP - BRFH
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
More

CCOJY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCOJY and CCEP have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCOJY and CCEP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCOJY
1D Price
Change %
CCOJY100%
N/A
CCEP - CCOJY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
CELH - CCOJY
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
KDP - CCOJY
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
BRFH - CCOJY
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
CCHGY - CCOJY
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
More