Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRF vs ILF
BRF vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs ILF
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$15.53
Change+$0.18 (+1.17%)
Volume$674
Net Assets20.83M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$28.23
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
Volume$773.74K
Net Assets1.92B
BRF vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. ILF commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Hold and ILF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.92B vs. BRF (20.8M). BRF has a higher annual dividend yield than ILF: BRF (41.278) vs ILF (38.187). BRF was incepted earlier than ILF: BRF (16 years) vs ILF (24 years). ILF (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than BRF (0.60). BRF has a higher turnover ILF (18.00) vs ILF (18.00).
| BRF | ILF | BRF / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 41.278 | 38.187 | 108% |
| Net Assets | 20.8M | 1.92B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.47 | 128% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 18.00 | 167% |
| Yield | 2.75 | 5.16 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 9 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BRF and PENG have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRF and PENG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | +1.17% | ||
| PENG - BRF | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.33% | ||
| INTR - BRF | 19% Poorly correlated | +1.90% | ||
| CBDBY - BRF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VINP - BRF | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.09% | ||
| KAR - BRF | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
More | ||||
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | +0.39% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 76% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 66% Closely correlated | +2.46% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
More | ||||