Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRF vs ILF
BRF vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs ILF
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$15.40
Change+$0.13 (+0.85%)
Volume$1.71K
Net Assets20.15M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$26.64
Change+$0.13 (+0.49%)
Volume$1.6M
Net Assets1.75B
BRF vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. ILF commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Hold and ILF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.75B vs. BRF (20.2M). BRF has a higher annual dividend yield than ILF: BRF (40.052) vs ILF (30.404). BRF was incepted earlier than ILF: BRF (16 years) vs ILF (24 years). ILF (0.48) has a lower expense ratio than BRF (0.60). BRF has a higher turnover ILF (7.00) vs ILF (7.00).
| BRF | ILF | BRF / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 40.052 | 30.404 | 132% |
| Net Assets | 20.2M | 1.75B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.48 | 125% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 7.00 | 429% |
| Yield | 2.91 | 5.69 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 25 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRF has been loosely correlated with INTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRF jumps, then INTR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | +0.83% | ||
| INTR - BRF | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| VINP - BRF | 57% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ARCO - BRF | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| AZUL - BRF | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| VTEX - BRF | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | +0.49% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 76% Closely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 71% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 69% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 69% Closely correlated | +2.62% | ||
| NU - ILF | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
More | ||||