Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRF vs ILF
BRF vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs ILF
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$16.94
Change-$0.25 (-1.45%)
Volume$150
Net Assets23.01M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$30.46
Change-$0.30 (-0.98%)
Volume$2.31M
Net Assets2.27B
BRF vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. ILF commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Buy and ILF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 2.27B vs. BRF (23M). BRF has a higher annual dividend yield than ILF: BRF (56.331) vs ILF (50.571). BRF was incepted earlier than ILF: BRF (17 years) vs ILF (24 years). ILF (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than BRF (0.60). BRF has a higher turnover ILF (18.00) vs ILF (18.00).
| BRF | ILF | BRF / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 56.331 | 50.571 | 111% |
| Net Assets | 23M | 2.27B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.47 | 128% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 18.00 | 167% |
| Yield | 2.74 | 5.07 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 88% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRF has been closely correlated with INTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BRF jumps, then INTR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| INTR - BRF | 69% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| VINP - BRF | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| ARCO - BRF | 49% Loosely correlated | +5.27% | ||
| AFYA - BRF | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| VTEX - BRF | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
More | ||||
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | -1.16% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 76% Closely correlated | -2.43% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 71% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 70% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.13% | ||
More | ||||