Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRF vs ILF
BRF vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs ILF
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$19.23
Change+$3.68 (+23.67%)
Volume$10.49K
Net Assets25.31M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$36.69
Change+$8.78 (+31.46%)
Volume$5.06M
Net Assets4.17B
BRF vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. ILF commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Buy and ILF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 4.17B vs. BRF (25.3M). ILF (20.493) and BRF (19.921) have matching annual dividend yield . BRF was incepted earlier than ILF: BRF (17 years) vs ILF (24 years). ILF (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than BRF (0.60). BRF has a higher turnover ILF (18.00) vs ILF (18.00).
| BRF | ILF | BRF / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 19.921 | 20.493 | 97% |
| Net Assets | 25.3M | 4.17B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.47 | 128% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 18.00 | 167% |
| Yield | 4.79 | 3.79 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRF has been loosely correlated with ARCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRF jumps, then ARCO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | +2.44% | ||
| ARCO - BRF | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| PENG - BRF | 27% Poorly correlated | -8.03% | ||
| EE - BRF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.42% | ||
| INTR - BRF | 18% Poorly correlated | +3.33% | ||
| CBDBY - BRF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | +2.98% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 76% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 71% Closely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | +2.57% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 65% Loosely correlated | +5.33% | ||
More | ||||