Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRF vs FLN
BRF vs FLN Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs FLN
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$16.23
Change+$0.17 (+1.06%)
Volume$200
Net Assets21.73M
First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$21.26
Change+$0.05 (+0.24%)
Volume$100
Net Assets17.19M
BRF vs FLN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. FLN commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Hold and FLN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRF has more net assets: 21.7M vs. FLN (17.2M). BRF has a higher annual dividend yield than FLN: BRF (46.098) vs FLN (43.026). BRF was incepted earlier than FLN: BRF (16 years) vs FLN (14 years). BRF (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than FLN (0.80). FLN has a higher turnover BRF (30.00) vs BRF (30.00).
| BRF | FLN | BRF / FLN | |
| Gain YTD | 46.098 | 43.026 | 107% |
| Net Assets | 21.7M | 17.2M | 126% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.80 | 75% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 75.00 | 40% |
| Yield | 2.85 | 3.71 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | FLN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BRF and PENG have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRF and PENG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | -2.20% | ||
| PENG - BRF | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.07% | ||
| INTR - BRF | 15% Poorly correlated | -2.18% | ||
| VINP - BRF | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| KAR - BRF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
| ITRN - BRF | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.43% | ||
More | ||||
FLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLN has been loosely correlated with NU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLN jumps, then NU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLN | 100% | -0.99% | ||
| NU - FLN | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| LTM - FLN | 48% Loosely correlated | -6.05% | ||
| BAP - FLN | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
| OMAB - FLN | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.98% |