Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRF vs FLLA
BRF vs FLLA Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs FLLA
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$16.23
Change+$0.17 (+1.06%)
Volume$200
Net Assets21.73M
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$23.25
Change+$0.18 (+0.78%)
Volume$860
Net Assets39.17M
BRF vs FLLA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. FLLA commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Hold and FLLA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLLA has more net assets: 39.2M vs. BRF (21.7M). BRF has a higher annual dividend yield than FLLA: BRF (46.098) vs FLLA (39.890). BRF was incepted earlier than FLLA: BRF (16 years) vs FLLA (7 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than BRF (0.60). BRF has a higher turnover FLLA (14.31) vs FLLA (14.31).
| BRF | FLLA | BRF / FLLA | |
| Gain YTD | 46.098 | 39.890 | 116% |
| Net Assets | 21.7M | 39.2M | 55% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.19 | 316% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 14.31 | 210% |
| Yield | 2.85 | 5.18 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | FLLA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BRF and PENG have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRF and PENG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | -2.20% | ||
| PENG - BRF | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.07% | ||
| INTR - BRF | 15% Poorly correlated | -2.18% | ||
| VINP - BRF | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| KAR - BRF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
| ITRN - BRF | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.43% | ||
More | ||||
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | -1.16% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | 47% Loosely correlated | -6.05% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.98% |