Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRF vs FLLA
BRF vs FLLA Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs FLLA
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$19.23
Change+$3.68 (+23.67%)
Volume$10.49K
Net Assets25.31M
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$28.67
Change+$6.08 (+26.91%)
Volume$40K
Net Assets71.39M
BRF vs FLLA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. FLLA commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Buy and FLLA is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLLA has more net assets: 71.4M vs. BRF (25.3M). BRF (19.921) and FLLA (19.013) have matching annual dividend yield . BRF was incepted earlier than FLLA: BRF (17 years) vs FLLA (7 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than BRF (0.60). BRF has a higher turnover FLLA (14.31) vs FLLA (14.31).
| BRF | FLLA | BRF / FLLA | |
| Gain YTD | 19.921 | 19.013 | 105% |
| Net Assets | 25.3M | 71.4M | 35% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.19 | 316% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 14.31 | 210% |
| Yield | 4.79 | 5.27 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | FLLA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRF has been loosely correlated with ARCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRF jumps, then ARCO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | +2.44% | ||
| ARCO - BRF | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| PENG - BRF | 27% Poorly correlated | -8.03% | ||
| EE - BRF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.42% | ||
| INTR - BRF | 18% Poorly correlated | +3.33% | ||
| CBDBY - BRF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | +2.92% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.35% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.19% | ||
| ECL - FLLA | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
| Q - FLLA | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||