Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRF vs FLLA
BRF vs FLLA Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs FLLA
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$17.91
Change+$0.09 (+0.51%)
Volume$3.08K
Net Assets24.24M
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$25.23
Change+$0.08 (+0.32%)
Volume$12.07K
Net Assets45.37M
BRF vs FLLA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. FLLA commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Hold and FLLA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLLA has more net assets: 45.4M vs. BRF (24.2M). BRF has a higher annual dividend yield than FLLA: BRF (60.332) vs FLLA (52.511). BRF was incepted earlier than FLLA: BRF (17 years) vs FLLA (7 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than BRF (0.60). BRF has a higher turnover FLLA (14.31) vs FLLA (14.31).
| BRF | FLLA | BRF / FLLA | |
| Gain YTD | 60.332 | 52.511 | 115% |
| Net Assets | 24.2M | 45.4M | 53% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.19 | 316% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 14.31 | 210% |
| Yield | 2.55 | 4.61 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | FLLA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 88% | 14 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRF has been closely correlated with INTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BRF jumps, then INTR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| INTR - BRF | 71% Closely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| VINP - BRF | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| ARCO - BRF | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| AFYA - BRF | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| VTEX - BRF | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | +1.60% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| ECL - FLLA | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
| ACGP - FLLA | -5% Poorly correlated | N/A |