Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRF vs FLLA
BRF vs FLLA Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs FLLA
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$14.38
Change-$0.06 (-0.42%)
Volume$22.79K
Net Assets18.76M
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$20.86
Change-$0.09 (-0.43%)
Volume$11.26K
Net Assets35.49M
BRF vs FLLA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. FLLA commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Hold and FLLA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLLA has more net assets: 35.5M vs. BRF (18.8M). BRF has a higher annual dividend yield than FLLA: BRF (30.731) vs FLLA (26.524). BRF was incepted earlier than FLLA: BRF (16 years) vs FLLA (7 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than BRF (0.60). BRF has a higher turnover FLLA (14.31) vs FLLA (14.31).
| BRF | FLLA | BRF / FLLA | |
| Gain YTD | 30.731 | 26.524 | 116% |
| Net Assets | 18.8M | 35.5M | 53% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.19 | 316% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 14.31 | 210% |
| Yield | 2.91 | 5.32 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | FLLA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRF has been loosely correlated with INTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRF jumps, then INTR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| INTR - BRF | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| VINP - BRF | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| ARCO - BRF | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| VTEX - BRF | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| AFYA - BRF | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
More | ||||
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.02% | ||
| AC - FLLA | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.60% |