Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRF vs FLLA
BRF vs FLLA Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs FLLA
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$15.02
Change+$0.11 (+0.74%)
Volume$8.33K
Net Assets19.65M
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$21.64
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
Volume$3.61K
Net Assets36.79M
BRF vs FLLA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. FLLA commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Buy and FLLA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLLA has more net assets: 36.8M vs. BRF (19.7M). BRF has a higher annual dividend yield than FLLA: BRF (35.569) vs FLLA (31.011). BRF was incepted earlier than FLLA: BRF (16 years) vs FLLA (7 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than BRF (0.60). BRF has a higher turnover FLLA (14.31) vs FLLA (14.31).
| BRF | FLLA | BRF / FLLA | |
| Gain YTD | 35.569 | 31.011 | 115% |
| Net Assets | 19.7M | 36.8M | 54% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.19 | 316% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 14.31 | 210% |
| Yield | 3.15 | 5.56 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | FLLA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BRF and PENG have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRF and PENG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | -0.44% | ||
| PENG - BRF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
| INTR - BRF | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
| KAR - BRF | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.84% | ||
| VINP - BRF | 7% Poorly correlated | +2.48% | ||
| ITRN - BRF | 4% Poorly correlated | -2.83% | ||
More | ||||
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | -0.94% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.26% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| AC - FLLA | -1% Poorly correlated | -0.11% |