Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRF vs FLLA
BRF vs FLLA Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs FLLA
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$15.53
Change+$0.18 (+1.17%)
Volume$674
Net Assets20.83M
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$22.75
Change+$0.19 (+0.84%)
Volume$28.31K
Net Assets38.43M
BRF vs FLLA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. FLLA commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Hold and FLLA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLLA has more net assets: 38.4M vs. BRF (20.8M). BRF has a higher annual dividend yield than FLLA: BRF (41.278) vs FLLA (37.957). BRF was incepted earlier than FLLA: BRF (16 years) vs FLLA (7 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than BRF (0.60). BRF has a higher turnover FLLA (14.31) vs FLLA (14.31).
| BRF | FLLA | BRF / FLLA | |
| Gain YTD | 41.278 | 37.957 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 20.8M | 38.4M | 54% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.19 | 316% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 14.31 | 210% |
| Yield | 2.75 | 4.90 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | FLLA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 9 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BRF and PENG have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRF and PENG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | +1.17% | ||
| PENG - BRF | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.33% | ||
| INTR - BRF | 19% Poorly correlated | +1.90% | ||
| CBDBY - BRF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VINP - BRF | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.09% | ||
| KAR - BRF | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
More | ||||
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | +0.84% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| ECL - FLLA | 17% Poorly correlated | +2.27% | ||
| ACGP - FLLA | -5% Poorly correlated | +1.09% |