Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRF vs EWZ
BRF vs EWZ Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs EWZ
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$15.53
Change+$0.18 (+1.17%)
Volume$674
Net Assets20.83M
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF
Price$29.71
Change+$0.47 (+1.61%)
Volume$18.52M
Net Assets5.66B
BRF vs EWZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. EWZ commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Hold and EWZ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWZ has more net assets: 5.66B vs. BRF (20.8M). BRF has a higher annual dividend yield than EWZ: BRF (41.278) vs EWZ (34.447). BRF was incepted earlier than EWZ: BRF (16 years) vs EWZ (25 years). EWZ (0.59) and BRF (0.60) have comparable expense ratios . BRF has a higher turnover EWZ (22.00) vs EWZ (22.00).
| BRF | EWZ | BRF / EWZ | |
| Gain YTD | 41.278 | 34.447 | 120% |
| Net Assets | 20.8M | 5.66B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.59 | 102% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 22.00 | 136% |
| Yield | 2.75 | 5.19 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | EWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 19 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 9 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BRF and PENG have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRF and PENG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | +1.17% | ||
| PENG - BRF | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.33% | ||
| INTR - BRF | 19% Poorly correlated | +1.90% | ||
| CBDBY - BRF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VINP - BRF | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.09% | ||
| KAR - BRF | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
More | ||||
EWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWZ has been closely correlated with XP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWZ jumps, then XP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y