BRDG
Price
$9.60
Change
-$0.04 (-0.41%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
454.85M
64 days until earnings call
JTCPF
Price
$15.02
Change
-$0.18 (-1.18%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.67B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRDG vs JTCPF

Header iconBRDG vs JTCPF Comparison
Open Charts BRDG vs JTCPFBanner chart's image
Bridge Investment Group Holdings
Price$9.60
Change-$0.04 (-0.41%)
Volume$5.86M
Capitalization454.85M
JTC
Price$15.02
Change-$0.18 (-1.18%)
Volume$13K
Capitalization2.67B
BRDG vs JTCPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JTCPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRDG vs. JTCPF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRDG is a Hold and JTCPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BRDG: $9.60 vs. JTCPF: $15.02)
Brand notoriety: BRDG and JTCPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRDG: 551% vs. JTCPF: 317%
Market capitalization -- BRDG: $454.85M vs. JTCPF: $2.67B
BRDG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $454.85M. JTCPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRDG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJTCPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRDG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JTCPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, JTCPF is a better buy in the long-term than BRDG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRDG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JTCPF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRDG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • JTCPF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BRDG and JTCPF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BRDG (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JTCPF (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRDG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JTCPF($2.67B) has a higher market cap than BRDG($455M). BRDG has higher P/E ratio than JTCPF: BRDG (71.62) vs JTCPF (53.48). BRDG (16.186) and JTCPF (15.547) have similar YTD gains .
BRDGJTCPFBRDG / JTCPF
Capitalization455M2.67B17%
EBITDA39.1MN/A-
Gain YTD16.18615.547104%
P/E Ratio71.6253.48134%
Revenue398MN/A-
Total Cash87.5MN/A-
Total Debt450MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRDGJTCPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
40%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
14%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JTCPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DESIX11.320.12
+1.07%
DFA Em Mkts Sustnby Cor 1 Instl
OLGAX85.60-0.12
-0.14%
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth A
LKBAX29.33-0.05
-0.17%
LKCM Balanced
SWLGX16.67-0.04
-0.24%
Schwab ® US Large-Cap Growth Idx
GSVSX16.62-0.08
-0.48%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Svc

BRDG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRDG has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BRDG jumps, then APO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRDG
1D Price
Change %
BRDG100%
N/A
APO - BRDG
66%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
JHG - BRDG
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
KKR - BRDG
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
EQH - BRDG
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
CG - BRDG
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
More

JTCPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JTCPF and FNCSF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JTCPF and FNCSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JTCPF
1D Price
Change %
JTCPF100%
N/A
FNCSF - JTCPF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
BRDG - JTCPF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OFSTF - JTCPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.48%
ELRNF - JTCPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+11.74%
FNNCF - JTCPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
More