BRDG
Price
$10.69
Change
-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
280.98M
16 days until earnings call
JTCPF
Price
$11.30
Change
-$0.21 (-1.82%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.48B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRDG vs JTCPF

Header iconBRDG vs JTCPF Comparison
Open Charts BRDG vs JTCPFBanner chart's image
Bridge Investment Group Holdings
Price$10.69
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Volume$310.05K
Capitalization280.98M
JTC
Price$11.30
Change-$0.21 (-1.82%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization1.48B
BRDG vs JTCPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JTCPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRDG vs. JTCPF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRDG is a Hold and JTCPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BRDG: $10.69 vs. JTCPF: $11.30)
Brand notoriety: BRDG and JTCPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRDG: 70% vs. JTCPF: 43%
Market capitalization -- BRDG: $280.98M vs. JTCPF: $1.48B
BRDG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $280.98M. JTCPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRDG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJTCPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRDG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JTCPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRDG is a better buy in the long-term than JTCPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRDG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JTCPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRDG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • JTCPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JTCPF is a better buy in the short-term than BRDG.

Price Growth

BRDG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.28% price change this week, while JTCPF (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRDG is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.61% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JTCPF($1.48B) has a higher market cap than BRDG($281M). JTCPF has higher P/E ratio than BRDG: JTCPF (32.05) vs BRDG (26.30). BRDG YTD gains are higher at: 28.794 vs. JTCPF (-13.071). JTCPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 38M vs. BRDG (-36.42M). BRDG has more cash in the bank: 77.5M vs. JTCPF (60.9M). JTCPF has less debt than BRDG: JTCPF (197M) vs BRDG (484M). BRDG has higher revenues than JTCPF: BRDG (391M) vs JTCPF (174M).
BRDGJTCPFBRDG / JTCPF
Capitalization281M1.48B19%
EBITDA-36.42M38M-96%
Gain YTD28.794-13.071-220%
P/E Ratio26.3032.0582%
Revenue391M174M225%
Total Cash77.5M60.9M127%
Total Debt484M197M246%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRDGJTCPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JTCPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SUHJY11.860.04
+0.34%
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
MMND0.03N/A
N/A
Mastermind, Inc.
SWDHF0.45N/A
N/A
Skyworth Group Limited
ASCCY25.28-0.32
-1.25%
Asics Corp.
ECAOF0.12-0.02
-14.90%
Eco Atlantic Oil & Gas Ltd

BRDG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRDG has been loosely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRDG jumps, then APO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRDG
1D Price
Change %
BRDG100%
-0.19%
APO - BRDG
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
KKR - BRDG
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
JHG - BRDG
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
CG - BRDG
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
BX - BRDG
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.01%
More

JTCPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JTCPF and FNCSF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JTCPF and FNCSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JTCPF
1D Price
Change %
JTCPF100%
-1.83%
FNCSF - JTCPF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRDG - JTCPF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
OFSTF - JTCPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
ELRNF - JTCPF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNNCF - JTCPF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More