BRDG
Price
$9.60
Change
-$0.04 (-0.41%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
454.85M
64 days until earnings call
EQH
Price
$53.22
Change
-$0.15 (-0.28%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.94B
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRDG vs EQH

Header iconBRDG vs EQH Comparison
Open Charts BRDG vs EQHBanner chart's image
Bridge Investment Group Holdings
Price$9.60
Change-$0.04 (-0.41%)
Volume$5.86M
Capitalization454.85M
Equitable Holdings
Price$53.22
Change-$0.15 (-0.28%)
Volume$19.31K
Capitalization15.94B
BRDG vs EQH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EQH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRDG vs. EQH commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRDG is a Hold and EQH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BRDG: $9.60 vs. EQH: $53.37)
Brand notoriety: BRDG and EQH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRDG: 551% vs. EQH: 140%
Market capitalization -- BRDG: $454.85M vs. EQH: $15.94B
BRDG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $454.85M. EQH’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $15.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $171.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRDG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEQH’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • BRDG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • EQH’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQH is a better buy in the long-term than BRDG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRDG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EQH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRDG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EQH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BRDG and EQH are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BRDG (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EQH (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRDG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

EQH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.12% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EQH($15.9B) has a higher market cap than BRDG($455M). BRDG has higher P/E ratio than EQH: BRDG (71.62) vs EQH (41.26). BRDG YTD gains are higher at: 16.186 vs. EQH (14.867). EQH has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. BRDG (87.5M). BRDG has less debt than EQH: BRDG (450M) vs EQH (6.8B). EQH has higher revenues than BRDG: EQH (13.6B) vs BRDG (398M).
BRDGEQHBRDG / EQH
Capitalization455M15.9B3%
EBITDA39.1MN/A-
Gain YTD16.18614.867109%
P/E Ratio71.6241.26174%
Revenue398M13.6B3%
Total Cash87.5M43.5B0%
Total Debt450M6.8B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQH: Fundamental Ratings
EQH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRDGEQH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EQH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PBMIX8.390.13
+1.57%
Polen US SMID Company Growth Instl
BRXVX16.390.10
+0.61%
MFS Blended Research Intl Eq R6
MNBIX20.570.09
+0.44%
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term I
FRIFX12.380.05
+0.41%
Fidelity Real Estate Income
CGEOX20.04-0.03
-0.15%
Calamos Global Equity R6

BRDG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRDG has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BRDG jumps, then APO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRDG
1D Price
Change %
BRDG100%
N/A
APO - BRDG
66%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
JHG - BRDG
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
KKR - BRDG
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
EQH - BRDG
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
CG - BRDG
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
More

EQH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQH has been closely correlated with CRBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQH jumps, then CRBG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQH
1D Price
Change %
EQH100%
-1.29%
CRBG - EQH
85%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
AMP - EQH
82%
Closely correlated
-4.42%
JHG - EQH
80%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
CG - EQH
79%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
PFG - EQH
79%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
More