BRDG
Price
$8.50
Change
+$0.11 (+1.31%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
65 days until earnings call
CG
Price
$50.22
Change
+$1.19 (+2.43%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
44 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BRDG vs CG

Header iconBRDG vs CG Comparison
Open Charts BRDG vs CGBanner chart's image
Bridge Investment Group Holdings
Price$8.50
Change+$0.11 (+1.31%)
Volume$229.06K
CapitalizationN/A
Carlyle Group (The)
Price$50.22
Change+$1.19 (+2.43%)
Volume$4M
CapitalizationN/A
BRDG vs CG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRDG vs. CG commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRDG is a Hold and CG is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (BRDG: $8.50 vs. CG: $50.22)
Brand notoriety: BRDG and CG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRDG: 101% vs. CG: 152%
Market capitalization -- BRDG: $280.98M vs. CG: $16.93B
BRDG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $280.98M. CG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $16.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRDG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BRDG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the long-term than BRDG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRDG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRDG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the short-term than BRDG.

Price Growth

BRDG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -7.71% price change this week, while CG (@Investment Managers) price change was -4.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRDG is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

CG is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CG($16.9B) has a higher market cap than BRDG($281M). CG has higher P/E ratio than BRDG: CG (77.57) vs BRDG (26.30). CG YTD gains are higher at: 27.367 vs. BRDG (-8.514). BRDG has less debt than CG: BRDG (484M) vs CG (9.26B). CG has higher revenues than BRDG: CG (1.32B) vs BRDG (391M).
BRDGCGBRDG / CG
Capitalization281M16.9B2%
EBITDA-36.42MN/A-
Gain YTD-8.51427.367-31%
P/E Ratio26.3077.5734%
Revenue391M1.32B30%
Total Cash77.5MN/A-
Total Debt484M9.26B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CG: Fundamental Ratings
CG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38
SMR RATING
1..100
33
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRDGCG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

BRDG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRDG has been loosely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRDG jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRDG
1D Price
Change %
BRDG100%
+1.31%
BAM - BRDG
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
BX - BRDG
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
PAX - BRDG
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
STT - BRDG
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.91%
CG - BRDG
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.43%
More

CG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with TPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then TPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CG
1D Price
Change %
CG100%
+2.43%
TPG - CG
69%
Closely correlated
+1.31%
BX - CG
68%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
ARES - CG
66%
Closely correlated
+2.90%
JHG - CG
66%
Closely correlated
+2.04%
APAM - CG
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
More