BRDCF
Price
$45.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
30.61B
CTTAY
Price
$6.73
Change
+$0.07 (+1.05%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
13.29B
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRDCF vs CTTAY

Header iconBRDCF vs CTTAY Comparison
Open Charts BRDCF vs CTTAYBanner chart's image
Bridgestone
Price$45.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$186
Capitalization30.61B
Continental AG
Price$6.73
Change+$0.07 (+1.05%)
Volume$86.19K
Capitalization13.29B
BRDCF vs CTTAY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CTTAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRDCF vs. CTTAY commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRDCF is a Buy and CTTAY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BRDCF: $45.20 vs. CTTAY: $6.73)
Brand notoriety: BRDCF and CTTAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRDCF: 120% vs. CTTAY: 152%
Market capitalization -- BRDCF: $30.61B vs. CTTAY: $13.29B
BRDCF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $30.61B. CTTAY’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $13.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $90.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRDCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCTTAY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRDCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CTTAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRDCF is a better buy in the long-term than CTTAY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRDCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CTTAY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRDCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CTTAY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRDCF is a better buy in the short-term than CTTAY.

Price Growth

BRDCF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +4.72% price change this week, while CTTAY (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +0.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTTAY is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.60% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRDCF($30.6B) has a higher market cap than CTTAY($13.3B). BRDCF has higher P/E ratio than CTTAY: BRDCF (22.80) vs CTTAY (10.29). CTTAY YTD gains are higher at: 38.365 vs. BRDCF (25.590).
BRDCFCTTAYBRDCF / CTTAY
Capitalization30.6B13.3B230%
EBITDA698BN/A-
Gain YTD25.59038.36567%
P/E Ratio22.8010.29222%
Revenue4.37TN/A-
Total Cash698BN/A-
Total Debt795BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRDCF vs CTTAY: Fundamental Ratings
BRDCF
CTTAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4591
SMR RATING
1..100
10053
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
981
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRDCF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as CTTAY (27). This means that BRDCF’s stock grew similarly to CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

BRDCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTTAY (91). This means that BRDCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAY's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRDCF (100). This means that CTTAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRDCF’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as BRDCF (50). This means that CTTAY’s stock grew similarly to BRDCF’s over the last 12 months.

BRDCF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTTAY (81). This means that BRDCF’s stock grew significantly faster than CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRDCFCTTAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CTTAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GFI40.851.52
+3.86%
Gold Fields Ltd
DBI3.770.03
+0.80%
Designer Brands
HRI118.87-0.69
-0.58%
Herc Holdings
JYD0.14N/A
-2.27%
Jayud Global Logistics Limited
VALN9.71-0.24
-2.41%
Valneva SE

BRDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRDCF and BRDCY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRDCF and BRDCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRDCF
1D Price
Change %
BRDCF100%
N/A
BRDCY - BRDCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
WLMTF - BRDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+14.00%
CTTAY - BRDCF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
CTTAF - BRDCF
10%
Poorly correlated
+7.08%
CMMCF - BRDCF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CTTAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTTAY has been loosely correlated with VLEEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTTAY jumps, then VLEEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTTAY
1D Price
Change %
CTTAY100%
+1.05%
VLEEY - CTTAY
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
CTTAF - CTTAY
61%
Loosely correlated
+7.08%
PASTF - CTTAY
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MGDDY - CTTAY
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
BRDCY - CTTAY
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
More