BRDCF
Price
$41.00
Change
-$0.22 (-0.53%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
28.65B
CTTAY
Price
$9.07
Change
+$0.10 (+1.11%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
16.01B
8 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRDCF vs CTTAY

Header iconBRDCF vs CTTAY Comparison
Open Charts BRDCF vs CTTAYBanner chart's image
Bridgestone
Price$41.00
Change-$0.22 (-0.53%)
Volume$100
Capitalization28.65B
Continental AG
Price$9.07
Change+$0.10 (+1.11%)
Volume$47.19K
Capitalization16.01B
BRDCF vs CTTAY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CTTAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRDCF vs. CTTAY commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRDCF is a Buy and CTTAY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BRDCF: $41.00 vs. CTTAY: $9.07)
Brand notoriety: BRDCF and CTTAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRDCF: 6% vs. CTTAY: 153%
Market capitalization -- BRDCF: $28.65B vs. CTTAY: $16.01B
BRDCF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $28.65B. CTTAY’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $16.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRDCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCTTAY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRDCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CTTAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRDCF is a better buy in the long-term than CTTAY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRDCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CTTAY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRDCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CTTAY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BRDCF and CTTAY are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BRDCF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CTTAY (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +4.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTTAY is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+3.18% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRDCF($28.6B) has a higher market cap than CTTAY($16B). CTTAY has higher P/E ratio than BRDCF: CTTAY (69.93) vs BRDCF (12.56). CTTAY YTD gains are higher at: 42.319 vs. BRDCF (13.921). BRDCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 793B vs. CTTAY (4.19B). BRDCF has more cash in the bank: 526B vs. CTTAY (2.38B). CTTAY has less debt than BRDCF: CTTAY (8.01B) vs BRDCF (802B). BRDCF has higher revenues than CTTAY: BRDCF (4.26T) vs CTTAY (40.4B).
BRDCFCTTAYBRDCF / CTTAY
Capitalization28.6B16B179%
EBITDA793B4.19B18,944%
Gain YTD13.92142.31933%
P/E Ratio12.5669.9318%
Revenue4.26T40.4B10,552%
Total Cash526B2.38B22,101%
Total Debt802B8.01B10,010%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRDCF vs CTTAY: Fundamental Ratings
BRDCF
CTTAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6380
SMR RATING
1..100
5972
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3176
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTTAY's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as BRDCF (19). This means that CTTAY’s stock grew similarly to BRDCF’s over the last 12 months.

BRDCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as CTTAY (80). This means that BRDCF’s stock grew similarly to CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

BRDCF's SMR Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as CTTAY (72). This means that BRDCF’s stock grew similarly to CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as BRDCF (52). This means that CTTAY’s stock grew similarly to BRDCF’s over the last 12 months.

BRDCF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTTAY (76). This means that BRDCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRDCFCTTAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CTTAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTGX55.151.41
+2.62%
Protagonist Therapeutics
CFFN6.230.02
+0.32%
Capitol Federal Financial
TTWO224.75-1.00
-0.44%
Take-Two Interactive Software
ISPR2.94-0.05
-1.67%
Ispire Technology
RMCO1.33-0.06
-4.32%
Royalty Management Holding Corp

BRDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRDCF and BRDCY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRDCF and BRDCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRDCF
1D Price
Change %
BRDCF100%
N/A
BRDCY - BRDCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
WLMTF - BRDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTTAY - BRDCF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
CTTAF - BRDCF
10%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
CMMCF - BRDCF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CTTAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTTAY has been loosely correlated with VLEEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTTAY jumps, then VLEEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTTAY
1D Price
Change %
CTTAY100%
+1.11%
VLEEY - CTTAY
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
CTTAF - CTTAY
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.11%
PASTF - CTTAY
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MGDDY - CTTAY
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.97%
BRDCY - CTTAY
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
More