BRCNF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
17.89M
KLG
Price
$19.97
Change
+$0.17 (+0.86%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.61B
80 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BRCNF vs KLG

Header iconBRCNF vs KLG Comparison
Open Charts BRCNF vs KLGBanner chart's image
Burcon NutraScience
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$401
Capitalization17.89M
WK Kellogg
Price$19.97
Change+$0.17 (+0.86%)
Volume$760.71K
Capitalization1.61B
BRCNF vs KLG Comparison Chart
Loading...
KLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRCNF vs. KLG commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRCNF is a Hold and KLG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BRCNF: $0.07 vs. KLG: $19.36)
Brand notoriety: BRCNF and KLG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRCNF: 137% vs. KLG: 113%
Market capitalization -- BRCNF: $17.89M vs. KLG: $1.61B
BRCNF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $17.89M. KLG’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $1.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRCNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKLG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BRCNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KLG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KLG is a better buy in the long-term than BRCNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KLG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • KLG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BRCNF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -1.31% price change this week, while KLG (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +14.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

KLG is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.32% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KLG($1.61B) has a higher market cap than BRCNF($17.9M). BRCNF YTD gains are higher at: 36.364 vs. KLG (7.615). KLG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 221M vs. BRCNF (-10.8M). KLG has more cash in the bank: 89M vs. BRCNF (1.64M). BRCNF has less debt than KLG: BRCNF (70.7K) vs KLG (499M). KLG has higher revenues than BRCNF: KLG (2.76B) vs BRCNF (244K).
BRCNFKLGBRCNF / KLG
Capitalization17.9M1.61B1%
EBITDA-10.8M221M-5%
Gain YTD36.3647.615478%
P/E RatioN/A15.46-
Revenue244K2.76B0%
Total Cash1.64M89M2%
Total Debt70.7K499M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRCNF: Fundamental Ratings
BRCNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

BRCNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRCNF and SENEB have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRCNF and SENEB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRCNF
1D Price
Change %
BRCNF100%
N/A
SENEB - BRCNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LWAY - BRCNF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.56%
WEST - BRCNF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
CELV - BRCNF
12%
Poorly correlated
-17.81%
KLG - BRCNF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.02%
More

KLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KLG and NOMD have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KLG and NOMD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KLG
1D Price
Change %
KLG100%
-2.02%
NOMD - KLG
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
GIS - KLG
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
JBSS - KLG
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
SJM - KLG
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
FLO - KLG
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
More