BRCC
Price
$1.53
Change
+$0.02 (+1.32%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
174.15M
60 days until earnings call
MLFNF
Price
$25.37
Change
-$0.25 (-0.98%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.15B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRCC vs MLFNF

Header iconBRCC vs MLFNF Comparison
Open Charts BRCC vs MLFNFBanner chart's image
BRC
Price$1.53
Change+$0.02 (+1.32%)
Volume$416.59K
Capitalization174.15M
Maple Leaf Foods
Price$25.37
Change-$0.25 (-0.98%)
Volume$6.05K
Capitalization3.15B
BRCC vs MLFNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRCC vs. MLFNF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRCC is a StrongBuy and MLFNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BRCC: $1.53 vs. MLFNF: $25.37)
Brand notoriety: BRCC and MLFNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRCC: 52% vs. MLFNF: 143%
Market capitalization -- BRCC: $174.15M vs. MLFNF: $3.15B
BRCC [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $174.15M. MLFNF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $3.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $240.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRCC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLFNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRCC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MLFNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLFNF is a better buy in the long-term than BRCC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRCC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLFNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRCC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MLFNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRCC is a better buy in the short-term than MLFNF.

Price Growth

BRCC (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -1.29% price change this week, while MLFNF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -2.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +895.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRCC is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.34% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLFNF($3.15B) has a higher market cap than BRCC($174M). MLFNF YTD gains are higher at: 79.929 vs. BRCC (-51.735). MLFNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 638M vs. BRCC (-7.35M). MLFNF has more cash in the bank: 236M vs. BRCC (4.3M). BRCC has less debt than MLFNF: BRCC (103M) vs MLFNF (1.76B). MLFNF has higher revenues than BRCC: MLFNF (5.1B) vs BRCC (389M).
BRCCMLFNFBRCC / MLFNF
Capitalization174M3.15B6%
EBITDA-7.35M638M-1%
Gain YTD-51.73579.929-65%
P/E RatioN/A24.30-
Revenue389M5.1B8%
Total Cash4.3M236M2%
Total Debt103M1.76B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLFNF: Fundamental Ratings
MLFNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71
SMR RATING
1..100
67
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
47

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRCCMLFNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SRCO0.100.02
+24.87%
Sparta Commercial Services, Inc.
CLNXF35.680.38
+1.08%
Cellnex Telecom SA
MSUXF13.07N/A
N/A
Misumi Group, Inc.
RNWEF0.19N/A
N/A
REC SILICON ASA
NENTY0.02N/A
N/A
Viaplay Group AB

BRCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRCC has been loosely correlated with BRBR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRCC jumps, then BRBR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRCC
1D Price
Change %
BRCC100%
+1.32%
BRBR - BRCC
40%
Loosely correlated
-7.54%
THS - BRCC
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HAIN - BRCC
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.15%
JJSF - BRCC
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
USNA - BRCC
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
More

MLFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLFNF and BRCC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLFNF and BRCC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLFNF
1D Price
Change %
MLFNF100%
-0.98%
BRCC - MLFNF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
NCHEY - MLFNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRRTY - MLFNF
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
NCRA - MLFNF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
LYSFF - MLFNF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More