Advertisement
BRCC vs HCWC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRCC is a StrongBuy and HCWC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BRCC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHCWC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BRCC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HCWC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BRCC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCWC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BRCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- HCWC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
BRCC (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +0.17% price change this week, while HCWC (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -17.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +232.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
BRCC is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2026.
HCWC is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (+1.29% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
| BRCC | HCWC | BRCC / HCWC | |
| Capitalization | 94M | 4.94M | 1,904% |
| EBITDA | -7.54M | 3.64M | -207% |
| Gain YTD | -26.126 | 8.247 | -317% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 391M | 79.2M | 494% |
| Total Cash | 9.48M | 3M | 316% |
| Total Debt | 62.9M | 20M | 315% |
| BRCC | HCWC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 79% |
Advertisement
BRCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRCC has been loosely correlated with JJSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRCC jumps, then JJSF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRCC | 100% | +4.05% | ||
| JJSF - BRCC | 50% Loosely correlated | +4.60% | ||
| LFVN - BRCC | 49% Loosely correlated | +3.54% | ||
| FLO - BRCC | 44% Loosely correlated | +5.26% | ||
| DDC - BRCC | 43% Loosely correlated | -6.64% | ||
| BRBR - BRCC | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
More | ||||
HCWC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HCWC and FAMI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCWC and FAMI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HCWC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCWC | 100% | -2.93% | ||
| FAMI - HCWC | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.94% | ||
| DAR - HCWC | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
| STKH - HCWC | 17% Poorly correlated | -2.55% | ||
| KLG - HCWC | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BRCC - HCWC | 12% Poorly correlated | +4.05% | ||
More | ||||