BRC
Price
$67.96
Change
-$1.51 (-2.17%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.87B
83 days until earnings call
LZ
Price
$8.74
Change
-$0.33 (-3.64%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.52B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRC vs LZ

Header iconBRC vs LZ Comparison
Open Charts BRC vs LZBanner chart's image
Brady
Price$67.96
Change-$1.51 (-2.17%)
Volume$200.74K
Capitalization2.87B
LegalZoom.com
Price$8.74
Change-$0.33 (-3.64%)
Volume$1.29M
Capitalization2.52B
BRC vs LZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
BRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRC vs. LZ commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRC is a StrongBuy and LZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (BRC: $67.96 vs. LZ: $8.74)
Brand notoriety: BRC and LZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRC: 106% vs. LZ: 66%
Market capitalization -- BRC: $2.87B vs. LZ: $2.52B
BRC [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $2.87B. LZ’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $2.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRC is a better buy in the long-term than LZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LZ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LZ is a better buy in the short-term than BRC.

Price Growth

BRC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -2.91% price change this week, while LZ (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -4.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRC is expected to report earnings on Sep 05, 2025.

LZ is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-1.97% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRC($2.87B) has a higher market cap than LZ($2.52B). LZ has higher P/E ratio than BRC: LZ (191.57) vs BRC (15.64). LZ YTD gains are higher at: 16.378 vs. BRC (-7.329). BRC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 275M vs. LZ (60.1M). LZ has more cash in the bank: 226M vs. BRC (144M). LZ has less debt than BRC: LZ (9.02M) vs BRC (73.4M). BRC has higher revenues than LZ: BRC (1.34B) vs LZ (661M).
BRCLZBRC / LZ
Capitalization2.87B2.52B114%
EBITDA275M60.1M458%
Gain YTD-7.32916.378-45%
P/E Ratio15.64191.578%
Revenue1.34B661M202%
Total Cash144M226M64%
Total Debt73.4M9.02M814%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRC: Fundamental Ratings
BRC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
66
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26
SMR RATING
1..100
50
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRCLZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NANR57.620.89
+1.57%
SPDR S&P® North American Natural Res ETF
GLV5.610.01
+0.18%
Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund
BKUI49.73-0.01
-0.01%
BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF
NZF11.85-0.02
-0.17%
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund
NBCR27.62-0.32
-1.16%
Neuberger Berman Core Equity ETF

BRC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRC has been loosely correlated with MSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRC jumps, then MSA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRC
1D Price
Change %
BRC100%
-2.17%
MSA - BRC
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.61%
BCO - BRC
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
GHC - BRC
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
ABM - BRC
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.00%
FA - BRC
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.36%
More

LZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LZ has been loosely correlated with UDMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LZ jumps, then UDMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LZ
1D Price
Change %
LZ100%
-3.64%
UDMY - LZ
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.50%
BRC - LZ
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
GPN - LZ
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.37%
RGP - LZ
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.36%
BV - LZ
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.90%
More