Advertisement
BRBR vs LW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRBR is a Hold and LW is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BRBR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BRBR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BRBR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BRBR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
BRBR (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -14.81% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +5.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +238.76%.
Reported Earning Dates
BRBR is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2026.
LW is expected to report earnings on Apr 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (+1.51% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
| BRBR | LW | BRBR / LW | |
| Capitalization | 2.48B | 6.64B | 37% |
| EBITDA | 376M | 1.12B | 34% |
| Gain YTD | -21.025 | 15.012 | -140% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.56 | 17.31 | 84% |
| Revenue | 2.32B | 6.47B | 36% |
| Total Cash | 71.8M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.08B | 3.95B | 27% |
BRBR | LW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LW's Valuation (27) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRBR (85) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRBR’s over the last 12 months.
LW's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BRBR (100) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to BRBR’s over the last 12 months.
BRBR's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as LW (40) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that BRBR’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.
LW's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BRBR (91) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to BRBR’s over the last 12 months.
LW's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BRBR (97) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to BRBR’s over the last 12 months.
| BRBR | LW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 14 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CSUIX | 25.72 | 0.13 | +0.51% |
| Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure I | |||
| BCAMX | 74.87 | 0.32 | +0.43% |
| Boston Common ESG Impact US Equity | |||
| RSECX | 16.32 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
| Russell Inv US Strategic Equity C | |||
| RGLEX | 28.73 | -0.21 | -0.73% |
| American Funds Global Insight R-4 | |||
| WCMSX | 25.47 | -0.33 | -1.28% |
| WCM International Small Cap Growth Instl | |||
BRBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRBR has been closely correlated with SMPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BRBR jumps, then SMPL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRBR | 100% | +1.10% | ||
| SMPL - BRBR | 68% Closely correlated | +3.81% | ||
| NCRA - BRBR | 54% Loosely correlated | -12.47% | ||
| LFVN - BRBR | 48% Loosely correlated | +3.54% | ||
| LW - BRBR | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.22% | ||
| DDC - BRBR | 46% Loosely correlated | -6.64% | ||
More | ||||
LW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LW has been loosely correlated with SMPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LW jumps, then SMPL could also see price increases.