BRANF
Price
$2.25
Change
-$0.57 (-20.21%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
105.09M
SKSBF
Price
$25.55
Change
+$0.55 (+2.20%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
10.04B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRANF vs SKSBF

Header iconBRANF vs SKSBF Comparison
Open Charts BRANF vs SKSBFBanner chart's image
Baran Group
Price$2.25
Change-$0.57 (-20.21%)
Volume$100
Capitalization105.09M
Skanska AB
Price$25.55
Change+$0.55 (+2.20%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization10.04B
BRANF vs SKSBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKSBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRANF vs. SKSBF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRANF is a Hold and SKSBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BRANF: $2.25 vs. SKSBF: $25.55)
Brand notoriety: BRANF and SKSBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRANF: 100% vs. SKSBF: 45%
Market capitalization -- BRANF: $105.09M vs. SKSBF: $10.04B
BRANF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $105.09M. SKSBF’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $10.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.31T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRANF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSKSBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRANF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SKSBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BRANF and SKSBF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRANF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SKSBF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRANF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • SKSBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRANF is a better buy in the short-term than SKSBF.

Price Growth

BRANF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SKSBF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +203.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-0.42% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SKSBF($10B) has a higher market cap than BRANF($105M). SKSBF has higher P/E ratio than BRANF: SKSBF (16.24) vs BRANF (7.00). SKSBF YTD gains are higher at: 24.817 vs. BRANF (-20.213). SKSBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.64B vs. BRANF (72.2M). SKSBF has more cash in the bank: 26.3B vs. BRANF (97.6M). BRANF has less debt than SKSBF: BRANF (215M) vs SKSBF (6.79B). SKSBF has higher revenues than BRANF: SKSBF (185B) vs BRANF (669M).
BRANFSKSBFBRANF / SKSBF
Capitalization105M10B1%
EBITDA72.2M8.64B1%
Gain YTD-20.21324.817-81%
P/E Ratio7.0016.2443%
Revenue669M185B0%
Total Cash97.6M26.3B0%
Total Debt215M6.79B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRANF vs SKSBF: Fundamental Ratings
BRANF
SKSBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3526
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10078
SMR RATING
1..100
5869
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1265
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRANF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SKSBF (39). This means that BRANF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SKSBF’s over the last 12 months.

SKSBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as BRANF (100). This means that SKSBF’s stock grew similarly to BRANF’s over the last 12 months.

BRANF's SMR Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as SKSBF (69). This means that BRANF’s stock grew similarly to SKSBF’s over the last 12 months.

SKSBF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRANF (81). This means that SKSBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRANF’s over the last 12 months.

BRANF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SKSBF (65). This means that BRANF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SKSBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRANFSKSBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKSBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DDWWF5.350.21
+4.11%
Dividend Growth Split Corp.
DUSL71.552.25
+3.25%
Direxion Dly Industrials Bull 3X ShsETF
DEUS58.090.49
+0.85%
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF
JHMD39.310.29
+0.74%
JHancock Multifactor Developed Intl ETF
SDY141.070.97
+0.69%
SPDR® S&P Dividend ETF

BRANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRANF and PWR have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRANF and PWR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRANF
1D Price
Change %
BRANF100%
N/A
PWR - BRANF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
FIX - BRANF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.32%
SKSBF - BRANF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WSPOF - BRANF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
BRAGF - BRANF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SKSBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SKSBF and SNCAF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SKSBF and SNCAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKSBF
1D Price
Change %
SKSBF100%
N/A
SNCAF - SKSBF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
BRANF - SKSBF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SKBSY - SKSBF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
PNOCF - SKSBF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTOBF - SKSBF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More