Advertisement
BRAG vs FFIV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRAG is a Buy and FFIV is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BRAG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFFIV’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- BRAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FFIV’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BRAG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFIV’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BRAG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FFIV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BRAG (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +5.04% price change this week, while FFIV (@Computer Communications) price change was -1.16% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.07%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +70.70%.
Reported Earning Dates
BRAG is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
FFIV is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (-0.51% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
@Computer Communications (+0.13% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| BRAG | FFIV | BRAG / FFIV | |
| Capitalization | 75.3M | 18.7B | 0% |
| EBITDA | 13.6M | 853M | 2% |
| Gain YTD | -21.081 | 29.188 | -72% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 28.65 | - |
| Revenue | 105M | 3.03B | 3% |
| Total Cash | 4.24M | 1.43B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 4.94M | 260M | 2% |
BRAG | FFIV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 28 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 15 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BRAG's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FFIV (69) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that BRAG’s stock grew similarly to FFIV’s over the last 12 months.
FFIV's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for BRAG (100) in the null industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew significantly faster than BRAG’s over the last 12 months.
FFIV's SMR Rating (44) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRAG (95) in the null industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRAG’s over the last 12 months.
FFIV's Price Growth Rating (15) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRAG (65) in the null industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRAG’s over the last 12 months.
FFIV's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for BRAG (100) in the null industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew significantly faster than BRAG’s over the last 12 months.
| BRAG | FFIV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 33% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 10 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | N/A |
Advertisement
BRAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BRAG and INSE have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRAG and INSE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRAG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRAG | 100% | +5.61% | ||
| INSE - BRAG | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| NCNO - BRAG | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
| SMRT - BRAG | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.03% | ||
| PGY - BRAG | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.40% | ||
| FFIV - BRAG | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.27% | ||
More | ||||
FFIV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFIV has been loosely correlated with CVLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFIV jumps, then CVLT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFIV | 100% | +0.27% | ||
| CVLT - FFIV | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.40% | ||
| NTAP - FFIV | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| ATEN - FFIV | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| CPAY - FFIV | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| ZS - FFIV | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.79% | ||
More | ||||