BQST
Price
$0.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
22.28M
WHLT
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.02 (-20.00%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
1.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BQST vs WHLT

Header iconBQST vs WHLT Comparison
Open Charts BQST vs WHLTBanner chart's image
BioQuest
Price$0.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$950
Capitalization22.28M
Chase Packaging
Price$0.08
Change-$0.02 (-20.00%)
Volume$38.5K
Capitalization1.43M
BQST vs WHLT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BQST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BQST vs. WHLT commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQST is a Hold and WHLT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BQST: $0.60 vs. WHLT: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: BQST and WHLT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BQST: 97% vs. WHLT: 120%
Market capitalization -- BQST: $22.28M vs. WHLT: $1.43M
BQST [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $22.28M. WHLT’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $1.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BQST’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWHLT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BQST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WHLT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHLT is a better buy in the long-term than BQST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BQST’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHLT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BQST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WHLT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WHLT is a better buy in the short-term than BQST.

Price Growth

BQST (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WHLT (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.67% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BQST($22.3M) has a higher market cap than WHLT($1.43M). WHLT YTD gains are higher at: 185.714 vs. BQST (-39.800). WHLT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -53.86K vs. BQST (-450.28K). WHLT has more cash in the bank: 432K vs. BQST (15K). BQST (0) and WHLT (0) have equivalent revenues.
BQSTWHLTBQST / WHLT
Capitalization22.3M1.43M1,561%
EBITDA-450.28K-53.86K836%
Gain YTD-39.800185.714-21%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash15K432K3%
Total Debt183KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BQST vs WHLT: Fundamental Ratings
BQST
WHLT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9994
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3435
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10010
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2150

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BQST's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as WHLT (80). This means that BQST’s stock grew similarly to WHLT’s over the last 12 months.

BQST's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WHLT (100). This means that BQST’s stock grew similarly to WHLT’s over the last 12 months.

WHLT's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as BQST (99). This means that WHLT’s stock grew similarly to BQST’s over the last 12 months.

BQST's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as WHLT (35). This means that BQST’s stock grew similarly to WHLT’s over the last 12 months.

WHLT's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BQST (100). This means that WHLT’s stock grew significantly faster than BQST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BQSTWHLT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BQST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ORA87.713.07
+3.63%
Ormat Technologies
CTRM2.270.07
+3.18%
Castor Maritime
BFS35.310.15
+0.43%
Saul Centers
SYY77.180.04
+0.05%
Sysco Corp
NA8.38-0.42
-4.77%
Nano Labs Ltd

BQST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BQST and WHLT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BQST and WHLT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BQST
1D Price
Change %
BQST100%
N/A
WHLT - BQST
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELLH - BQST
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOREF - BQST
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AVNI - BQST
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DHCC - BQST
0%
Poorly correlated
-23.26%
More