BQSSF
Price
$2.84
Change
-$0.19 (-6.27%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
700.39M
CTTZF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
208.39M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BQSSF vs CTTZF

Header iconBQSSF vs CTTZF Comparison
Open Charts BQSSF vs CTTZFBanner chart's image
Boss Energy
Price$2.84
Change-$0.19 (-6.27%)
Volume$5.03K
Capitalization700.39M
Centaurus Metals
Price$0.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$350.78K
Capitalization208.39M
BQSSF vs CTTZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BQSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CTTZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BQSSF vs. CTTZF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQSSF is a Hold and CTTZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BQSSF: $2.84 vs. CTTZF: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: BQSSF and CTTZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BQSSF: 19% vs. CTTZF: 283%
Market capitalization -- BQSSF: $700.39M vs. CTTZF: $208.39M
BQSSF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $700.39M. CTTZF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $208.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BQSSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCTTZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BQSSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CTTZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BQSSF is a better buy in the long-term than CTTZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BQSSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CTTZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BQSSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CTTZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTTZF is a better buy in the short-term than BQSSF.

Price Growth

BQSSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -5.02% price change this week, while CTTZF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -5.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.41% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BQSSF($700M) has a higher market cap than CTTZF($208M). BQSSF YTD gains are higher at: 83.819 vs. CTTZF (0.308). BQSSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.1M vs. CTTZF (-29.74M). BQSSF has more cash in the bank: 20.9M vs. CTTZF (8.26M). CTTZF has less debt than BQSSF: CTTZF (116K) vs BQSSF (4M).
BQSSFCTTZFBQSSF / CTTZF
Capitalization700M208M337%
EBITDA13.1M-29.74M-44%
Gain YTD83.8190.30827,217%
P/E Ratio71.43N/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash20.9M8.26M253%
Total Debt4M116K3,448%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTTZF: Fundamental Ratings
CTTZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BQSSFCTTZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BQSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CTTZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPGCX14.920.12
+0.81%
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth C
DESCX22.820.17
+0.75%
DWS ESG Core Equity C
EPSIX24.570.12
+0.49%
NYLI Epoch Global Equity Yield Inv Class
GWSAX17.190.06
+0.35%
Gabelli Focused Gr and Inc A
MWEBX41.440.14
+0.34%
MFS Global Equity B

BQSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BQSSF has been loosely correlated with ISOU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BQSSF jumps, then ISOU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BQSSF
1D Price
Change %
BQSSF100%
-6.27%
ISOU - BQSSF
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
MGAFF - BQSSF
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
SRUUF - BQSSF
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.19%
LMRXF - BQSSF
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
EU - BQSSF
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.74%
More

CTTZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTTZF and RIGMF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTTZF and RIGMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTTZF
1D Price
Change %
CTTZF100%
-2.69%
RIGMF - CTTZF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFRRF - CTTZF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMGDF - CTTZF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
SLROF - CTTZF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BQSSF - CTTZF
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.27%
More