Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BQLCX vs VTSMX
BQLCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts BQLCX vs VTSMX
Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Instl
Price$23.07
Change+$0.12 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets411.96M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$149.99
Change+$1.28 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82T
BQLCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BQLCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQLCX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.82T vs. BQLCX (412M). VTSMX pays higher dividends than BQLCX: VTSMX (1.12) vs BQLCX (0.66). BQLCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: BQLCX (15 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). BQLCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). BQLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.20 vs. VTSMX (2.00). VTSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than BQLCX: VTSMX (3000) vs BQLCX (100000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.89 vs. BQLCX (1.40). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 95.59 vs. BQLCX (39.35).
| BQLCX | VTSMX | BQLCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.14 | 636% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.14 | 636% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.707 | 6.421 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 3000 | 3,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 412M | 1.82T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.12 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.40 | 13.89 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.35 | 62.08 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.35 | 95.59 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.04 | 198.05 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement