Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BQLCX vs VTSMX
BQLCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts BQLCX vs VTSMX
Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Instl
Price$22.30
Change-$0.22 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets401.26M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$142.86
Change-$1.69 (-1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82T
BQLCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BQLCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQLCX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.82T vs. BQLCX (401M). VTSMX pays higher dividends than BQLCX: VTSMX (1.18) vs BQLCX (0.71). BQLCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: BQLCX (15 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). BQLCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). BQLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.20 vs. VTSMX (2.00). VTSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than BQLCX: VTSMX (3000) vs BQLCX (100000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.06 vs. BQLCX (-1.04). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 91.36 vs. BQLCX (35.68).
| BQLCX | VTSMX | BQLCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.14 | 636% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.14 | 636% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.027 | 1.349 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 3000 | 3,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 401M | 1.82T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.18 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.04 | 10.06 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.36 | 57.59 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.68 | 91.36 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.79 | 178.92 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement