Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BQLCX vs RWMFX
BQLCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts BQLCX vs RWMFX
Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Instl
Price$23.19
Change+$0.03 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets413.43M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.43
Change-$0.15 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.49B
BQLCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BQLCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQLCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 203B vs. BQLCX (413M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than BQLCX: RWMFX (1.46) vs BQLCX (0.65). BQLCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: BQLCX (15 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). BQLCX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). BQLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.50 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BQLCX: RWMFX (250) vs BQLCX (100000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.61 vs. BQLCX (-0.08). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.87 vs. BQLCX (31.13).
| BQLCX | RWMFX | BQLCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.251 | 7.164 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 413M | 203B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.46 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.08 | 6.61 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.43 | 24.20 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.13 | 49.87 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.99 | 70.91 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement