Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BQLCX vs RWMFX
BQLCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts BQLCX vs RWMFX
Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Instl
Price$23.28
Change-$0.14 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets413.6M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.07
Change+$0.15 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
BQLCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BQLCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQLCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. BQLCX (414M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than BQLCX: RWMFX (1.43) vs BQLCX (0.64). BQLCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: BQLCX (15 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). BQLCX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). BQLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.50 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BQLCX: RWMFX (250) vs BQLCX (100000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. BQLCX (-0.88). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.81 vs. BQLCX (32.07).
| BQLCX | RWMFX | BQLCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.660 | 8.213 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 414M | 205B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.43 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.88 | 7.95 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.19 | 34.82 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.07 | 50.81 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.08 | 83.34 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement