Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BQLCX vs RWEBX
BQLCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts BQLCX vs RWEBX
Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Instl
Price$23.28
Change-$0.14 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets413.6M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.42
Change+$0.38 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
BQLCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BQLCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQLCX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. BQLCX (414M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than BQLCX: RWEBX (0.78) vs BQLCX (0.64). BQLCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: BQLCX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than BQLCX (0.66). BQLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.50 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BQLCX: RWEBX (250) vs BQLCX (100000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.12 vs. BQLCX (-0.88). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 46.70 vs. BQLCX (32.07).
| BQLCX | RWEBX | BQLCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.06 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.06 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.660 | 7.651 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 414M | 205B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.78 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.88 | 7.12 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.19 | 32.20 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.07 | 46.70 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.08 | 77.32 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement