BQ
Price
$3.02
Change
-$0.01 (-0.33%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
8.7M
WSM
Price
$202.42
Change
-$0.49 (-0.24%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
24.65B
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BQ vs WSM

Header iconBQ vs WSM Comparison
Open Charts BQ vs WSMBanner chart's image
Boqii Holding
Price$3.02
Change-$0.01 (-0.33%)
Volume$66.87K
Capitalization8.7M
Williams-Sonoma
Price$202.42
Change-$0.49 (-0.24%)
Volume$1.12M
Capitalization24.65B
BQ vs WSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BQ vs. WSM commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQ is a Buy and WSM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BQ: $3.02 vs. WSM: $202.42)
Brand notoriety: BQ and WSM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BQ: 60% vs. WSM: 84%
Market capitalization -- BQ: $8.7M vs. WSM: $24.65B
BQ [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $8.7M. WSM’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $24.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $51.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWSM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WSM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WSM is a better buy in the long-term than BQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BQ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BQ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WSM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WSM is a better buy in the short-term than BQ.

Price Growth

BQ (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +3.78% price change this week, while WSM (@Specialty Stores) price change was +7.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

WSM is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-0.38% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WSM($24.7B) has a higher market cap than BQ($8.7M). WSM YTD gains are higher at: 10.581 vs. BQ (-99.476).
BQWSMBQ / WSM
Capitalization8.7M24.7B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-99.47610.581-940%
P/E RatioN/A22.54-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A1.37B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WSM: Fundamental Ratings
WSM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
58
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20
SMR RATING
1..100
20
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BQWSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QLTI25.390.18
+0.73%
GMO International Quality ETF
LSAF44.520.07
+0.15%
LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor® US Cr Eq ETF
IPDP20.52N/A
N/A
Dividend Performers ETF
SCHK31.29-0.06
-0.19%
Schwab 1000 ETF
AMDL9.10-1.38
-13.17%
GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF

BQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BQ and UXIN have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BQ and UXIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BQ
1D Price
Change %
BQ100%
-0.17%
UXIN - BQ
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
KXIN - BQ
17%
Poorly correlated
+13.57%
WSM - BQ
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
SPWH - BQ
11%
Poorly correlated
+12.29%
CWH - BQ
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
More

WSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSM has been closely correlated with RH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WSM jumps, then RH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WSM
1D Price
Change %
WSM100%
-0.24%
RH - WSM
67%
Closely correlated
+6.70%
FND - WSM
65%
Loosely correlated
+5.70%
LOW - WSM
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.04%
ARHS - WSM
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
ASO - WSM
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
More