BQ
Price
$2.45
Change
+$0.41 (+20.10%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.12M
WINH
Price
$0.20
Change
+$0.07 (+53.85%)
Updated
May 29 closing price
Capitalization
7.5M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BQ vs WINH

Header iconBQ vs WINH Comparison
Open Charts BQ vs WINHBanner chart's image
Boqii Holding
Price$2.45
Change+$0.41 (+20.10%)
Volume$146.29K
Capitalization1.12M
Willcox International Holdings
Price$0.20
Change+$0.07 (+53.85%)
Volume$200
Capitalization7.5M
BQ vs WINH Comparison Chart
Loading...
BQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BQ vs. WINH commentary
Jun 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQ is a Hold and WINH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BQ: $2.12 vs. WINH: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: BQ and WINH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BQ: 20% vs. WINH: 1%
Market capitalization -- BQ: $1.12M vs. WINH: $7.5M
BQ [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $1.12M. WINH’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $7.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWINH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WINH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WINH is a better buy in the long-term than BQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BQ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BQ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

BQ (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -3.64% price change this week, while WINH (@Specialty Stores) price change was -15.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.34% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WINH($7.5M) has a higher market cap than BQ($1.12M). WINH YTD gains are higher at: -27.429 vs. BQ (-41.111). WINH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.24M vs. BQ (-61.01M). BQ has higher revenues than WINH: BQ (1.09B) vs WINH (16.7M).
BQWINHBQ / WINH
Capitalization1.12M7.5M15%
EBITDA-61.01M8.24M-741%
Gain YTD-41.111-27.429150%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.09B16.7M6,539%
Total CashN/A1.19M-
Total DebtN/A5.28M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WINH: Fundamental Ratings
WINH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
99
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
15
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

BQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BQ and UCAR have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BQ and UCAR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BQ
1D Price
Change %
BQ100%
-3.20%
UCAR - BQ
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
KXIN - BQ
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
UXIN - BQ
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
ASO - BQ
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
ONEW - BQ
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
More

WINH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WINH and SSILF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WINH and SSILF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WINH
1D Price
Change %
WINH100%
-15.33%
SSILF - WINH
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WFAFY - WINH
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
ARKO - WINH
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.79%
BQ - WINH
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.20%
JUMSF - WINH
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More