BPZZF
Price
$14.15
Change
+$0.02 (+0.14%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
303.04M
DPZUF
Price
$12.40
Change
-$0.95 (-7.12%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.18B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPZZF vs DPZUF

Header iconBPZZF vs DPZUF Comparison
Open Charts BPZZF vs DPZUFBanner chart's image
Boston Pizza Royalties Income Fund
Price$14.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
Volume$616
Capitalization303.04M
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$12.40
Change-$0.95 (-7.12%)
Volume$304
Capitalization1.18B
BPZZF vs DPZUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPZZF vs. DPZUF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPZZF is a Hold and DPZUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BPZZF: $14.15 vs. DPZUF: $12.40)
Brand notoriety: BPZZF and DPZUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPZZF: 55% vs. DPZUF: 16%
Market capitalization -- BPZZF: $303.04M vs. DPZUF: $1.18B
BPZZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $303.04M. DPZUF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPZZF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileDPZUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPZZF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • DPZUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the long-term than DPZUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPZZF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DPZUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPZZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • DPZUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the short-term than DPZUF.

Price Growth

BPZZF (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.70% price change this week, while DPZUF (@Restaurants) price change was -11.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DPZUF($1.18B) has a higher market cap than BPZZF($303M). DPZUF has higher P/E ratio than BPZZF: DPZUF (137.10) vs BPZZF (14.48). BPZZF YTD gains are higher at: 14.761 vs. DPZUF (-32.609). DPZUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 195M vs. BPZZF (49.3M). DPZUF has higher revenues than BPZZF: DPZUF (2.26B) vs BPZZF (50M).
BPZZFDPZUFBPZZF / DPZUF
Capitalization303M1.18B26%
EBITDA49.3M195M25%
Gain YTD14.761-32.609-45%
P/E Ratio14.48137.1011%
Revenue50M2.26B2%
Total Cash4.58MN/A-
Total Debt86.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPZZF vs DPZUF: Fundamental Ratings
BPZZF
DPZUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11100
SMR RATING
1..100
7291
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4590
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
196
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPZZF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (19). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPZUF (100). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew significantly faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (91). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZUF (90). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as BPZZF (19). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew similarly to BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPZZFDPZUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSPPX14.190.08
+0.57%
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth P
AILIX12.110.06
+0.50%
Cavanal Hill Hedged Equity Income Instl
EQNAX22.360.09
+0.40%
MFS Equity Income A
IVAEX23.780.09
+0.38%
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl I
MSFHX19.600.01
+0.05%
MFS Total Return R3

BPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPZZF and SBUX have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPZZF and SBUX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPZZF
1D Price
Change %
BPZZF100%
N/A
SBUX - BPZZF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
REBN - BPZZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
ARKR - BPZZF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGY - BPZZF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
DPUKY - BPZZF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.80%
More

DPZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPZUF and HLFFF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPZUF and HLFFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZUF
1D Price
Change %
DPZUF100%
-7.12%
HLFFF - DPZUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPUKY - DPZUF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.80%
BPZZF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRIUF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JBFCF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
More