BPZZF
Price
$15.65
Change
+$0.08 (+0.51%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
334.48M
DPZUF
Price
$9.23
Change
-$1.04 (-10.13%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
881.52M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPZZF vs DPZUF

Header iconBPZZF vs DPZUF Comparison
Open Charts BPZZF vs DPZUFBanner chart's image
Boston Pizza Royalties Income Fund
Price$15.65
Change+$0.08 (+0.51%)
Volume$1.31K
Capitalization334.48M
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$9.23
Change-$1.04 (-10.13%)
Volume$1.08K
Capitalization881.52M
BPZZF vs DPZUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPZZF vs. DPZUF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPZZF is a StrongBuy and DPZUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BPZZF: $15.65 vs. DPZUF: $9.23)
Brand notoriety: BPZZF and DPZUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPZZF: 134% vs. DPZUF: 211%
Market capitalization -- BPZZF: $334.48M vs. DPZUF: $881.52M
BPZZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $334.48M. DPZUF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $881.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $226.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPZZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDPZUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPZZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DPZUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the long-term than DPZUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPZZF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DPZUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPZZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • DPZUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BPZZF and DPZUF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BPZZF (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.69% price change this week, while DPZUF (@Restaurants) price change was -10.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.18%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.55% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DPZUF($882M) has a higher market cap than BPZZF($334M). DPZUF has higher P/E ratio than BPZZF: DPZUF (133.33) vs BPZZF (12.54). BPZZF YTD gains are higher at: 26.926 vs. DPZUF (-49.837). DPZUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 195M vs. BPZZF (58M). DPZUF has higher revenues than BPZZF: DPZUF (2.26B) vs BPZZF (50.8M).
BPZZFDPZUFBPZZF / DPZUF
Capitalization334M882M38%
EBITDA58M195M30%
Gain YTD26.926-49.837-54%
P/E Ratio12.54133.339%
Revenue50.8M2.26B2%
Total Cash5.31MN/A-
Total Debt86.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPZZF vs DPZUF: Fundamental Ratings
BPZZF
DPZUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7591
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10100
SMR RATING
1..100
6392
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4493
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
653
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPZZF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (21). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPZUF (100). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew significantly faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (92). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZUF (93). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPZZF (65). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPZZFDPZUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
40%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PBSYX16.100.27
+1.71%
Polen US Small Company Growth Y
CCACX22.540.27
+1.21%
Calvert Mid-Cap C
RGDTX11.420.09
+0.79%
Russell Inv Global Equity M
JEEIX16.810.04
+0.24%
JHancock Infrastructure I
FSSKX86.97N/A
N/A
Fidelity Stock Selec-Class K

BPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPZZF and SBUX have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPZZF and SBUX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPZZF
1D Price
Change %
BPZZF100%
+0.51%
SBUX - BPZZF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
REBN - BPZZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.92%
ARKR - BPZZF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.67%
CMPGY - BPZZF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
DPUKY - BPZZF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DPZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPZUF and HLFFF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPZUF and HLFFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZUF
1D Price
Change %
DPZUF100%
N/A
HLFFF - DPZUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPUKY - DPZUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPZZF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
KRIUF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JBFCF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
More