BPZZF
Price
$15.05
Change
-$0.80 (-5.05%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
320.19M
DPUKY
Price
$5.39
Change
-$0.01 (-0.19%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.02B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPZZF vs DPUKY

Header iconBPZZF vs DPUKY Comparison
Open Charts BPZZF vs DPUKYBanner chart's image
Boston Pizza Royalties Income Fund
Price$15.05
Change-$0.80 (-5.05%)
Volume$314
Capitalization320.19M
Dominos Pizza UK and IRL
Price$5.39
Change-$0.01 (-0.19%)
Volume$5.2K
Capitalization1.02B
BPZZF vs DPUKY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPUKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPZZF vs. DPUKY commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPZZF is a Hold and DPUKY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (BPZZF: $15.05 vs. DPUKY: $5.39)
Brand notoriety: BPZZF and DPUKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPZZF: 31% vs. DPUKY: 22%
Market capitalization -- BPZZF: $320.19M vs. DPUKY: $1.02B
BPZZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $320.19M. DPUKY’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPZZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDPUKY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPZZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DPUKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the long-term than DPUKY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPZZF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DPUKY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPZZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • DPUKY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the short-term than DPUKY.

Price Growth

BPZZF (@Restaurants) experienced а -5.06% price change this week, while DPUKY (@Restaurants) price change was -2.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.11% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DPUKY($1.02B) has a higher market cap than BPZZF($320M). BPZZF has higher P/E ratio than DPUKY: BPZZF (12.10) vs DPUKY (10.07). BPZZF YTD gains are higher at: 22.069 vs. DPUKY (-29.138). DPUKY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 163M vs. BPZZF (58M). DPUKY has more cash in the bank: 14.4M vs. BPZZF (5.31M). BPZZF has less debt than DPUKY: BPZZF (86.6M) vs DPUKY (230M). DPUKY has higher revenues than BPZZF: DPUKY (669M) vs BPZZF (50.8M).
BPZZFDPUKYBPZZF / DPUKY
Capitalization320M1.02B31%
EBITDA58M163M36%
Gain YTD22.069-29.138-76%
P/E Ratio12.1010.07120%
Revenue50.8M669M8%
Total Cash5.31M14.4M37%
Total Debt86.6M230M38%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPZZF vs DPUKY: Fundamental Ratings
BPZZF
DPUKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1963
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13100
SMR RATING
1..100
6311
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4686
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7185
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DPUKY's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as BPZZF (8). This means that DPUKY’s stock grew similarly to BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPUKY (100). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew significantly faster than DPUKY’s over the last 12 months.

DPUKY's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPZZF (63). This means that DPUKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPUKY (86). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPUKY’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as DPUKY (85). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DPUKY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPZZFDPUKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPUKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARIDX6.260.01
+0.16%
AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value I
HDGSX37.60-0.03
-0.08%
Hartford Dividend and Growth R4
BRUGX16.76-0.03
-0.18%
MFS Blended Research Value Equity C
NGDCX30.80-0.17
-0.55%
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth C
GSSUX43.46-0.33
-0.75%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value R6

BPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPZZF and SBUX have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPZZF and SBUX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPZZF
1D Price
Change %
BPZZF100%
-5.06%
SBUX - BPZZF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
REBN - BPZZF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
ARKR - BPZZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
CMPGY - BPZZF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
DPUKY - BPZZF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
More

DPUKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPUKY and BROS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPUKY and BROS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPUKY
1D Price
Change %
DPUKY100%
-0.19%
BROS - DPUKY
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
CMPGY - DPUKY
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
DMZPY - DPUKY
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
BPZZF - DPUKY
5%
Poorly correlated
-5.06%
KRUS - DPUKY
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
More