BPZZF
Price
$14.15
Change
+$0.02 (+0.14%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
303.04M
DPUKY
Price
$7.45
Change
+$0.27 (+3.76%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.37B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPZZF vs DPUKY

Header iconBPZZF vs DPUKY Comparison
Open Charts BPZZF vs DPUKYBanner chart's image
Boston Pizza Royalties Income Fund
Price$14.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
Volume$616
Capitalization303.04M
Dominos Pizza UK and IRL
Price$7.45
Change+$0.27 (+3.76%)
Volume$701
Capitalization1.37B
BPZZF vs DPUKY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPUKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPZZF vs. DPUKY commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPZZF is a Hold and DPUKY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BPZZF: $14.15 vs. DPUKY: $7.45)
Brand notoriety: BPZZF and DPUKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPZZF: 55% vs. DPUKY: 30%
Market capitalization -- BPZZF: $303.04M vs. DPUKY: $1.37B
BPZZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $303.04M. DPUKY’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPZZF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileDPUKY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPZZF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • DPUKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the long-term than DPUKY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPZZF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DPUKY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPZZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • DPUKY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DPUKY is a better buy in the short-term than BPZZF.

Price Growth

BPZZF (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.70% price change this week, while DPUKY (@Restaurants) price change was +12.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DPUKY($1.37B) has a higher market cap than BPZZF($303M). BPZZF has higher P/E ratio than DPUKY: BPZZF (14.48) vs DPUKY (11.93). BPZZF YTD gains are higher at: 14.761 vs. DPUKY (-3.722).
BPZZFDPUKYBPZZF / DPUKY
Capitalization303M1.37B22%
EBITDA49.3MN/A-
Gain YTD14.761-3.722-397%
P/E Ratio14.4811.93121%
Revenue50MN/A-
Total Cash4.58MN/A-
Total Debt86.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPZZF vs DPUKY: Fundamental Ratings
BPZZF
DPUKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11100
SMR RATING
1..100
7211
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4555
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1947
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPZZF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as DPUKY (8). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DPUKY’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPUKY (100). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew significantly faster than DPUKY’s over the last 12 months.

DPUKY's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPZZF (72). This means that DPUKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as DPUKY (55). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DPUKY’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as DPUKY (47). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DPUKY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPZZFDPUKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPUKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSPPX14.190.08
+0.57%
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth P
AILIX12.110.06
+0.50%
Cavanal Hill Hedged Equity Income Instl
EQNAX22.360.09
+0.40%
MFS Equity Income A
IVAEX23.780.09
+0.38%
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl I
MSFHX19.600.01
+0.05%
MFS Total Return R3

BPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPZZF and SBUX have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPZZF and SBUX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPZZF
1D Price
Change %
BPZZF100%
N/A
SBUX - BPZZF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
REBN - BPZZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
ARKR - BPZZF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGY - BPZZF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
DPUKY - BPZZF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.80%
More

DPUKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPUKY and BROS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPUKY and BROS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPUKY
1D Price
Change %
DPUKY100%
+3.80%
BROS - DPUKY
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.79%
CMPGY - DPUKY
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
DMZPY - DPUKY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPZZF - DPUKY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRUS - DPUKY
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
More