BPZZF
Price
$14.38
Change
+$0.18 (+1.27%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
306.46M
DMZPY
Price
$6.46
Change
+$0.64 (+11.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
1.16B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPZZF vs DMZPY

Header iconBPZZF vs DMZPY Comparison
Open Charts BPZZF vs DMZPYBanner chart's image
Boston Pizza Royalties Income Fund
Price$14.38
Change+$0.18 (+1.27%)
Volume$412
Capitalization306.46M
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$6.46
Change+$0.64 (+11.00%)
Volume$700
Capitalization1.16B
BPZZF vs DMZPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DMZPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPZZF vs. DMZPY commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPZZF is a StrongBuy and DMZPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (BPZZF: $14.38 vs. DMZPY: $6.46)
Brand notoriety: BPZZF and DMZPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPZZF: 49% vs. DMZPY: 81%
Market capitalization -- BPZZF: $304.84M vs. DMZPY: $1.15B
BPZZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $304.84M. DMZPY’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPZZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDMZPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPZZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DMZPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the long-term than DMZPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPZZF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DMZPY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPZZF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • DMZPY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DMZPY is a better buy in the short-term than BPZZF.

Price Growth

BPZZF (@Restaurants) experienced а +2.63% price change this week, while DMZPY (@Restaurants) price change was +6.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.43% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DMZPY($1.16B) has a higher market cap than BPZZF($306M). DMZPY has higher P/E ratio than BPZZF: DMZPY (143.34) vs BPZZF (14.74). BPZZF YTD gains are higher at: 16.610 vs. DMZPY (-29.237).
BPZZFDMZPYBPZZF / DMZPY
Capitalization306M1.16B26%
EBITDA49.3MN/A-
Gain YTD16.610-29.237-57%
P/E Ratio14.74143.3410%
Revenue50MN/A-
Total Cash4.58MN/A-
Total Debt86.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPZZF vs DMZPY: Fundamental Ratings
BPZZF
DMZPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14100
SMR RATING
1..100
7191
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4864
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
344
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPZZF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as DMZPY (22). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DMZPY’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DMZPY (100). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew significantly faster than DMZPY’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's SMR Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as DMZPY (91). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DMZPY’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as DMZPY (64). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DMZPY’s over the last 12 months.

DMZPY's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as BPZZF (34). This means that DMZPY’s stock grew similarly to BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPZZFDMZPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
41%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DMZPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGVYX26.740.09
+0.34%
American Funds Global Insight 529-A
TWAAX12.380.04
+0.32%
Thrivent International Equity A
MVGNX18.180.05
+0.28%
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity R6
MMUGX24.51-0.12
-0.49%
MFS Utilities R1
STMMX34.76-0.37
-1.05%
Sterling Capital Real Estate A

BPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPZZF and SBUX have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPZZF and SBUX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPZZF
1D Price
Change %
BPZZF100%
N/A
SBUX - BPZZF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
REBN - BPZZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.60%
ARKR - BPZZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.77%
CMPGY - BPZZF
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
DPUKY - BPZZF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DMZPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DMZPY and DPUKY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMZPY and DPUKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DMZPY
1D Price
Change %
DMZPY100%
+11.00%
DPUKY - DMZPY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRUS - DMZPY
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.64%
BPZZF - DMZPY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGF - DMZPY
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
CMPGY - DMZPY
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
More