BPZZF
Price
$15.57
Change
+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
333.06M
DMZPY
Price
$5.25
Change
+$0.25 (+5.00%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
874.37M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPZZF vs DMZPY

Header iconBPZZF vs DMZPY Comparison
Open Charts BPZZF vs DMZPYBanner chart's image
Boston Pizza Royalties Income Fund
Price$15.57
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Volume$216
Capitalization333.06M
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$5.25
Change+$0.25 (+5.00%)
Volume$598
Capitalization874.37M
BPZZF vs DMZPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DMZPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPZZF vs. DMZPY commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPZZF is a StrongBuy and DMZPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BPZZF: $15.57 vs. DMZPY: $5.25)
Brand notoriety: BPZZF and DMZPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPZZF: 23% vs. DMZPY: 76%
Market capitalization -- BPZZF: $333.06M vs. DMZPY: $874.37M
BPZZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $333.06M. DMZPY’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $874.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $225.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPZZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDMZPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPZZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DMZPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the long-term than DMZPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPZZF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DMZPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPZZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DMZPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the short-term than DMZPY.

Price Growth

BPZZF (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.83% price change this week, while DMZPY (@Restaurants) price change was -5.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.54% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DMZPY($874M) has a higher market cap than BPZZF($333M). DMZPY has higher P/E ratio than BPZZF: DMZPY (139.34) vs BPZZF (12.45). BPZZF YTD gains are higher at: 26.277 vs. DMZPY (-42.491).
BPZZFDMZPYBPZZF / DMZPY
Capitalization333M874M38%
EBITDA58MN/A-
Gain YTD26.277-42.491-62%
P/E Ratio12.45139.349%
Revenue50.8MN/A-
Total Cash5.31MN/A-
Total Debt86.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPZZF vs DMZPY: Fundamental Ratings
BPZZF
DMZPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7588
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10100
SMR RATING
1..100
6392
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4491
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
653
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPZZF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as DMZPY (16). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DMZPY’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DMZPY (100). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew significantly faster than DMZPY’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as DMZPY (92). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DMZPY’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DMZPY (91). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DMZPY’s over the last 12 months.

DMZPY's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPZZF (65). This means that DMZPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPZZFDMZPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
52%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DMZPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UINQX57.800.45
+0.78%
Victory Nasdaq 100 Index Institutional
LGORX27.24N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities R3
TSOEX15.35N/A
N/A
Nuveen International Res Eq Retire
LIMAX7.57-0.01
-0.13%
Cromwell Tran Sustainable Focus Investor
MENRX9.81-0.06
-0.61%
Madison Covered Call & Equity Income R6

BPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPZZF and SBUX have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPZZF and SBUX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPZZF
1D Price
Change %
BPZZF100%
+0.03%
SBUX - BPZZF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.82%
REBN - BPZZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
ARKR - BPZZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
CMPGY - BPZZF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
DPUKY - BPZZF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
More

DMZPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DMZPY and DPUKY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMZPY and DPUKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DMZPY
1D Price
Change %
DMZPY100%
N/A
DPUKY - DMZPY
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
KRUS - DMZPY
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
BPZZF - DMZPY
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
CMPGF - DMZPY
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
CMPGY - DMZPY
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
More