BPZZF
Price
$15.57
Change
+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
334.48M
CMPGY
Price
$33.83
Change
-$0.15 (-0.44%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
57.35B
81 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPZZF vs CMPGY

Header iconBPZZF vs CMPGY Comparison
Open Charts BPZZF vs CMPGYBanner chart's image
Boston Pizza Royalties Income Fund
Price$15.57
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Volume$216
Capitalization334.48M
Compass Group
Price$33.83
Change-$0.15 (-0.44%)
Volume$1.17M
Capitalization57.35B
BPZZF vs CMPGY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMPGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPZZF vs. CMPGY commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPZZF is a StrongBuy and CMPGY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BPZZF: $15.57 vs. CMPGY: $33.83)
Brand notoriety: BPZZF and CMPGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPZZF: 23% vs. CMPGY: 406%
Market capitalization -- BPZZF: $334.48M vs. CMPGY: $57.35B
BPZZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $334.48M. CMPGY’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $57.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $226.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPZZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCMPGY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPZZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CMPGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the long-term than CMPGY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPZZF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMPGY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPZZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CMPGY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the short-term than CMPGY.

Price Growth

BPZZF (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.83% price change this week, while CMPGY (@Restaurants) price change was -1.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMPGY is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.19% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPGY($57.3B) has a higher market cap than BPZZF($334M). CMPGY has higher P/E ratio than BPZZF: CMPGY (39.87) vs BPZZF (12.54). BPZZF YTD gains are higher at: 26.277 vs. CMPGY (2.600). CMPGY has more cash in the bank: 437M vs. BPZZF (5.31M). BPZZF has less debt than CMPGY: BPZZF (86.6M) vs CMPGY (7.12B).
BPZZFCMPGYBPZZF / CMPGY
Capitalization334M57.3B1%
EBITDA58MN/A-
Gain YTD26.2772.6001,011%
P/E Ratio12.5439.8731%
Revenue50.8MN/A-
Total Cash5.31M437M1%
Total Debt86.6M7.12B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPZZF vs CMPGY: Fundamental Ratings
BPZZF
CMPGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7554
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
108
SMR RATING
1..100
6395
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4459
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6528
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPZZF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMPGY (55). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as BPZZF (10). This means that CMPGY’s stock grew similarly to BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPGY (95). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPGY (59). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGY's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPZZF (65). This means that CMPGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPZZFCMPGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMPGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UINQX57.800.45
+0.78%
Victory Nasdaq 100 Index Institutional
LGORX27.24N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities R3
TSOEX15.35N/A
N/A
Nuveen International Res Eq Retire
LIMAX7.57-0.01
-0.13%
Cromwell Tran Sustainable Focus Investor
MENRX9.81-0.06
-0.61%
Madison Covered Call & Equity Income R6

BPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPZZF and SBUX have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPZZF and SBUX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPZZF
1D Price
Change %
BPZZF100%
+0.03%
SBUX - BPZZF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.82%
REBN - BPZZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
ARKR - BPZZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
CMPGY - BPZZF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
DPUKY - BPZZF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
More

CMPGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPGY and CMPGF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPGY and CMPGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPGY
1D Price
Change %
CMPGY100%
-0.44%
CMPGF - CMPGY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
NATH - CMPGY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
CNNE - CMPGY
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
BPZZF - CMPGY
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
KRUS - CMPGY
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
More