BPZZF
Price
$15.05
Change
-$0.80 (-5.05%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
320.19M
CMPGY
Price
$33.35
Change
+$0.18 (+0.54%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
56.17B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPZZF vs CMPGY

Header iconBPZZF vs CMPGY Comparison
Open Charts BPZZF vs CMPGYBanner chart's image
Boston Pizza Royalties Income Fund
Price$15.05
Change-$0.80 (-5.05%)
Volume$314
Capitalization320.19M
Compass Group
Price$33.35
Change+$0.18 (+0.54%)
Volume$214.99K
Capitalization56.17B
BPZZF vs CMPGY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMPGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPZZF vs. CMPGY commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPZZF is a Hold and CMPGY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (BPZZF: $15.05 vs. CMPGY: $33.35)
Brand notoriety: BPZZF and CMPGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPZZF: 31% vs. CMPGY: 87%
Market capitalization -- BPZZF: $320.19M vs. CMPGY: $56.17B
BPZZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $320.19M. CMPGY’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $56.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPZZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCMPGY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPZZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CMPGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BPZZF and CMPGY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPZZF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMPGY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPZZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CMPGY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the short-term than CMPGY.

Price Growth

BPZZF (@Restaurants) experienced а -5.06% price change this week, while CMPGY (@Restaurants) price change was -3.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMPGY is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.11% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPGY($56.2B) has a higher market cap than BPZZF($320M). CMPGY has higher P/E ratio than BPZZF: CMPGY (38.82) vs BPZZF (12.10). BPZZF YTD gains are higher at: 22.069 vs. CMPGY (1.144). CMPGY has more cash in the bank: 437M vs. BPZZF (5.31M). BPZZF has less debt than CMPGY: BPZZF (86.6M) vs CMPGY (7.12B).
BPZZFCMPGYBPZZF / CMPGY
Capitalization320M56.2B1%
EBITDA58MN/A-
Gain YTD22.0691.1441,929%
P/E Ratio12.1038.8231%
Revenue50.8MN/A-
Total Cash5.31M437M1%
Total Debt86.6M7.12B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPZZF vs CMPGY: Fundamental Ratings
BPZZF
CMPGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1959
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
139
SMR RATING
1..100
6395
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4661
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7129
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPZZF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMPGY (48). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as BPZZF (13). This means that CMPGY’s stock grew similarly to BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPGY (95). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPGY (61). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to CMPGY’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGY's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPZZF (71). This means that CMPGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPZZFCMPGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMPGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICU1.240.08
+6.90%
SeaStar Medical Holding Corp
JBIO8.120.51
+6.70%
Jade Biosciences Inc
IRTC173.93-1.53
-0.87%
iRhythm Technologies
MSTR323.31-4.47
-1.36%
Strategy Inc
PRLB49.34-1.50
-2.95%
Proto Labs

BPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPZZF and SBUX have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPZZF and SBUX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPZZF
1D Price
Change %
BPZZF100%
-5.06%
SBUX - BPZZF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
REBN - BPZZF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
ARKR - BPZZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
CMPGY - BPZZF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
DPUKY - BPZZF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
More

CMPGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPGY and CMPGF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPGY and CMPGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPGY
1D Price
Change %
CMPGY100%
+0.54%
CMPGF - CMPGY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
NATH - CMPGY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
CNNE - CMPGY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
BPZZF - CMPGY
15%
Poorly correlated
-5.06%
KRUS - CMPGY
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
More