BPZZF
Price
$15.05
Change
-$0.80 (-5.05%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
320.19M
CMPGF
Price
$33.61
Change
+$0.61 (+1.85%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
56.17B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPZZF vs CMPGF

Header iconBPZZF vs CMPGF Comparison
Open Charts BPZZF vs CMPGFBanner chart's image
Boston Pizza Royalties Income Fund
Price$15.05
Change-$0.80 (-5.05%)
Volume$314
Capitalization320.19M
Compass Group
Price$33.61
Change+$0.61 (+1.85%)
Volume$608
Capitalization56.17B
BPZZF vs CMPGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPZZF vs. CMPGF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPZZF is a Hold and CMPGF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (BPZZF: $15.05 vs. CMPGF: $33.61)
Brand notoriety: BPZZF and CMPGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPZZF: 31% vs. CMPGF: 13%
Market capitalization -- BPZZF: $320.19M vs. CMPGF: $56.17B
BPZZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $320.19M. CMPGF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $56.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPZZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCMPGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPZZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CMPGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BPZZF and CMPGF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPZZF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMPGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPZZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CMPGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the short-term than CMPGF.

Price Growth

BPZZF (@Restaurants) experienced а -5.06% price change this week, while CMPGF (@Restaurants) price change was -5.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.44% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPGF($56.2B) has a higher market cap than BPZZF($320M). CMPGF has higher P/E ratio than BPZZF: CMPGF (39.13) vs BPZZF (12.10). BPZZF YTD gains are higher at: 22.069 vs. CMPGF (3.810). CMPGF has more cash in the bank: 437M vs. BPZZF (5.31M). BPZZF has less debt than CMPGF: BPZZF (86.6M) vs CMPGF (7.12B).
BPZZFCMPGFBPZZF / CMPGF
Capitalization320M56.2B1%
EBITDA58MN/A-
Gain YTD22.0693.810579%
P/E Ratio12.1039.1331%
Revenue50.8MN/A-
Total Cash5.31M437M1%
Total Debt86.6M7.12B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPZZF vs CMPGF: Fundamental Ratings
BPZZF
CMPGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1996
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1311
SMR RATING
1..100
6395
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4661
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7126
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
765

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPZZF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMPGF (50). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMPGF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as BPZZF (13). This means that CMPGF’s stock grew similarly to BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPGF (95). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to CMPGF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPGF (61). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to CMPGF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPGF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPZZF (71). This means that CMPGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPZZFCMPGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LIGCX11.720.03
+0.26%
Loomis Sayles International Growth C
FSCDX29.82N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap A
STVYX18.43-0.03
-0.16%
SEI Tax-Managed Mgd Volatility Y (SIMT)
MYIIX9.89-0.04
-0.40%
NYLI WMC International Research Eq Cl I
JATIX78.50-0.50
-0.63%
Janus Henderson Glb Tech and Innovt I

BPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPZZF and SBUX have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPZZF and SBUX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPZZF
1D Price
Change %
BPZZF100%
-5.06%
SBUX - BPZZF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
REBN - BPZZF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
ARKR - BPZZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
CMPGY - BPZZF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
DPUKY - BPZZF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
More

CMPGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMPGF and CMPGY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMPGF and CMPGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPGF
1D Price
Change %
CMPGF100%
+1.86%
CMPGY - CMPGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
KRUS - CMPGF
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
DMPZF - CMPGF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
BPZZF - CMPGF
4%
Poorly correlated
-5.06%
JDWPY - CMPGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More