BPYPP
Price
$15.42
Change
+$0.02 (+0.13%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:39 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
CWK
Price
$15.88
Change
+$0.23 (+1.47%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.62B
34 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPYPP vs CWK

Header iconBPYPP vs CWK Comparison
Open Charts BPYPP vs CWKBanner chart's image
Brookfield Property Partners
Price$15.42
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Cushman & Wakefield
Price$15.88
Change+$0.23 (+1.47%)
Volume$25.65K
Capitalization3.62B
BPYPP vs CWK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPYPP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CWK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPYPP vs. CWK commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPYPP is a StrongBuy and CWK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BPYPP: $15.42 vs. CWK: $15.88)
Brand notoriety: BPYPP and CWK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPYPP: 14% vs. CWK: 36%
Market capitalization -- BPYPP: $0 vs. CWK: $3.62B
BPYPP [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $0. CWK’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $3.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPYPP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCWK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BPYPP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CWK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BPYPP and CWK are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPYPP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CWK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPYPP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CWK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CWK is a better buy in the short-term than BPYPP.

Price Growth

BPYPP (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -0.74% price change this week, while CWK (@Real Estate Development) price change was -4.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

CWK is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.57% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPYPP YTD gains are higher at: 21.948 vs. CWK (19.648). BPYPP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.89B vs. CWK (665M). BPYPP has more cash in the bank: 1.7B vs. CWK (618M). CWK has less debt than BPYPP: CWK (3.24B) vs BPYPP (51.5B). CWK has higher revenues than BPYPP: CWK (9.74B) vs BPYPP (7.92B).
BPYPPCWKBPYPP / CWK
CapitalizationN/A3.62B-
EBITDA3.89B665M585%
Gain YTD21.94819.648112%
P/E RatioN/A17.78-
Revenue7.92B9.74B81%
Total Cash1.7B618M276%
Total Debt51.5B3.24B1,589%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPYPP vs CWK: Fundamental Ratings
BPYPP
CWK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
706
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10081
SMR RATING
1..100
10065
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPYPP's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CWK (94) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that BPYPP’s stock grew significantly faster than CWK’s over the last 12 months.

CWK's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as BPYPP (100) in the null industry. This means that CWK’s stock grew similarly to BPYPP’s over the last 12 months.

CWK's SMR Rating (65) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPYPP (100) in the null industry. This means that CWK’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPYPP’s over the last 12 months.

CWK's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as BPYPP (51) in the null industry. This means that CWK’s stock grew similarly to BPYPP’s over the last 12 months.

CWK's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as BPYPP (100) in the null industry. This means that CWK’s stock grew similarly to BPYPP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPYPPCWK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPYPP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CWK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCIXU10.66N/A
N/A
Churchill Capital Corp IX
IMMX2.04-0.01
-0.49%
Immix Biopharma
HSHP8.60-0.05
-0.58%
Himalaya Shipping Ltd
IPG25.93-0.37
-1.41%
Interpublic Group of Companies (The)
VITL40.86-1.04
-2.48%
Vital Farms

BPYPP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPYPP has been closely correlated with BPYPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BPYPP jumps, then BPYPO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPYPP
1D Price
Change %
BPYPP100%
-0.71%
BPYPO - BPYPP
70%
Closely correlated
-0.99%
BPYPN - BPYPP
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
JLL - BPYPP
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
CBRE - BPYPP
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
CWK - BPYPP
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
More

CWK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWK has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CWK jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWK
1D Price
Change %
CWK100%
-0.95%
JLL - CWK
84%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
CBRE - CWK
79%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
NMRK - CWK
79%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
MMI - CWK
71%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
CIGI - CWK
70%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
More