BPYPO
Price
$15.10
Change
-$0.01 (-0.07%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:24 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IHS
Price
$8.16
Change
-$0.48 (-5.56%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:51 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.9B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPYPO vs IHS

Header iconBPYPO vs IHS Comparison
Open Charts BPYPO vs IHSBanner chart's image
Brookfield Property Partners
Price$15.10
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
Volume$600
CapitalizationN/A
IHS Holding
Price$8.16
Change-$0.48 (-5.56%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.9B
BPYPO vs IHS Comparison Chart in %
BPYPO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IHS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPYPO vs. IHS commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPYPO is a Buy and IHS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (BPYPO: $15.11 vs. IHS: $8.64)
Brand notoriety: BPYPO and IHS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPYPO: 59% vs. IHS: 146%
Market capitalization -- BPYPO: $0 vs. IHS: $2.9B
BPYPO [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $0. IHS’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $2.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPYPO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIHS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BPYPO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IHS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPYPO is a better buy in the long-term than IHS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPYPO’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IHS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPYPO’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • IHS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPYPO is a better buy in the short-term than IHS.

Price Growth

BPYPO (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +0.31% price change this week, while IHS (@Real Estate Development) price change was +9.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

IHS is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-1.06% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IHS YTD gains are higher at: 15.818 vs. BPYPO (5.795). BPYPO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.61B vs. IHS (995M). BPYPO has more cash in the bank: 1.82B vs. IHS (648M). IHS has less debt than BPYPO: IHS (3.9B) vs BPYPO (50.4B). BPYPO has higher revenues than IHS: BPYPO (7.2B) vs IHS (1.77B).
BPYPOIHSBPYPO / IHS
CapitalizationN/A2.9B-
EBITDA3.61B995M363%
Gain YTD5.79515.81837%
P/E RatioN/A6.26-
Revenue7.2B1.77B408%
Total Cash1.82B648M281%
Total Debt50.4B3.9B1,294%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPYPO: Fundamental Ratings
BPYPO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
16
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPYPOIHS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPYPO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IHS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIDRX14.660.16
+1.10%
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val SDR
GCTMX17.550.12
+0.69%
Goldman Sachs International T/M Eq C
JVMIX28.900.09
+0.31%
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap I
ISCGX5.17-0.06
-1.15%
Transamerica Small Cap Growth I
TGWRX10.22-0.23
-2.20%
Transamerica Large Growth R

BPYPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPYPO has been loosely correlated with BPYPP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPYPO jumps, then BPYPP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPYPO
1D Price
Change %
BPYPO100%
+0.18%
BPYPP - BPYPO
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
BPYPN - BPYPO
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
CBRE - BPYPO
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.55%
JLL - BPYPO
25%
Poorly correlated
-6.53%
IHS - BPYPO
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
More

IHS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IHS has been loosely correlated with S. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IHS jumps, then S could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IHS
1D Price
Change %
IHS100%
-1.03%
S - IHS
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LILA - IHS
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
TDS - IHS
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
LBRDK - IHS
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
LILAK - IHS
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
More