BPYPO
Price
$15.05
Change
+$0.05 (+0.33%)
Updated
Sep 26, 01:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
CWK
Price
$15.88
Change
+$0.23 (+1.47%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.62B
34 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPYPO vs CWK

Header iconBPYPO vs CWK Comparison
Open Charts BPYPO vs CWKBanner chart's image
Brookfield Property Partners
Price$15.05
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Cushman & Wakefield
Price$15.88
Change+$0.23 (+1.47%)
Volume$25.65K
Capitalization3.62B
BPYPO vs CWK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPYPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CWK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPYPO vs. CWK commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPYPO is a StrongBuy and CWK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BPYPO: $15.05 vs. CWK: $15.88)
Brand notoriety: BPYPO and CWK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPYPO: 8% vs. CWK: 36%
Market capitalization -- BPYPO: $0 vs. CWK: $3.62B
BPYPO [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $0. CWK’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $3.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPYPO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCWK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BPYPO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CWK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BPYPO and CWK are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPYPO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CWK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPYPO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CWK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BPYPO and CWK are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BPYPO (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -1.31% price change this week, while CWK (@Real Estate Development) price change was -4.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

CWK is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.57% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWK (19.648) and BPYPO (19.605) have similar YTD gains . BPYPO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.89B vs. CWK (665M). BPYPO has more cash in the bank: 1.7B vs. CWK (618M). CWK has less debt than BPYPO: CWK (3.24B) vs BPYPO (51.5B). CWK has higher revenues than BPYPO: CWK (9.74B) vs BPYPO (7.92B).
BPYPOCWKBPYPO / CWK
CapitalizationN/A3.62B-
EBITDA3.89B665M585%
Gain YTD19.60519.648100%
P/E RatioN/A17.78-
Revenue7.92B9.74B81%
Total Cash1.7B618M276%
Total Debt51.5B3.24B1,589%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPYPO vs CWK: Fundamental Ratings
BPYPO
CWK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
806
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10081
SMR RATING
1..100
10065
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPYPO's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CWK (94) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that BPYPO’s stock grew significantly faster than CWK’s over the last 12 months.

CWK's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as BPYPO (100) in the null industry. This means that CWK’s stock grew similarly to BPYPO’s over the last 12 months.

CWK's SMR Rating (65) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPYPO (100) in the null industry. This means that CWK’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPYPO’s over the last 12 months.

CWK's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as BPYPO (51) in the null industry. This means that CWK’s stock grew similarly to BPYPO’s over the last 12 months.

CWK's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as BPYPO (100) in the null industry. This means that CWK’s stock grew similarly to BPYPO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPYPOCWK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPYPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CWK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PETS2.650.01
+0.38%
PetMed Express
RAAQU10.50N/A
N/A
Real Asset Acquisition Corp.
FMAO25.72-0.08
-0.31%
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp
EDU50.76-0.22
-0.43%
New Oriental Education and Technology Group
GRDN25.45-0.76
-2.90%
Guardian Pharmacy Services Inc.

BPYPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPYPO has been loosely correlated with BPYPP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPYPO jumps, then BPYPP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPYPO
1D Price
Change %
BPYPO100%
-0.99%
BPYPP - BPYPO
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
BPYPN - BPYPO
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
REAX - BPYPO
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
JLL - BPYPO
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
CWK - BPYPO
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
More

CWK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWK has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CWK jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWK
1D Price
Change %
CWK100%
-0.95%
JLL - CWK
84%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
CBRE - CWK
79%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
NMRK - CWK
79%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
MMI - CWK
71%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
CIGI - CWK
70%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
More