BPYPN
Price
$13.56
Change
+$0.06 (+0.44%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MMI
Price
$27.54
Change
-$0.30 (-1.08%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.07B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPYPN vs MMI

Header iconBPYPN vs MMI Comparison
Open Charts BPYPN vs MMIBanner chart's image
Brookfield Property Partners
Price$13.56
Change+$0.06 (+0.44%)
Volume$2.42K
CapitalizationN/A
Marcus & Millichap
Price$27.54
Change-$0.30 (-1.08%)
Volume$215.27K
Capitalization1.07B
BPYPN vs MMI Comparison Chart in %
BPYPN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MMI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPYPN vs. MMI commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPYPN is a Buy and MMI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BPYPN: $13.56 vs. MMI: $27.54)
Brand notoriety: BPYPN and MMI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPYPN: 21% vs. MMI: 70%
Market capitalization -- BPYPN: $0 vs. MMI: $1.07B
BPYPN [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $0. MMI’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPYPN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMMI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BPYPN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MMI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPYPN is a better buy in the long-term than MMI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPYPN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMI’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPYPN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MMI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPYPN is a better buy in the short-term than MMI.

Price Growth

BPYPN (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +0.22% price change this week, while MMI (@Real Estate Development) price change was +0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

MMI is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.17% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPYPN YTD gains are higher at: 18.271 vs. MMI (-26.936). BPYPN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.61B vs. MMI (10.1M). BPYPN has more cash in the bank: 1.82B vs. MMI (242M). MMI has less debt than BPYPN: MMI (78.6M) vs BPYPN (50.4B). BPYPN has higher revenues than MMI: BPYPN (7.2B) vs MMI (751M).
BPYPNMMIBPYPN / MMI
CapitalizationN/A1.07B-
EBITDA3.61B10.1M35,723%
Gain YTD18.271-26.936-68%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue7.2B751M959%
Total Cash1.82B242M754%
Total Debt50.4B78.6M64,122%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPYPN vs MMI: Fundamental Ratings
BPYPN
MMI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5678
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1002
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPYPN's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MMI (80) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that BPYPN’s stock grew significantly faster than MMI’s over the last 12 months.

BPYPN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MMI (100) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that BPYPN’s stock grew similarly to MMI’s over the last 12 months.

MMI's SMR Rating (90) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as BPYPN (100) in the null industry. This means that MMI’s stock grew similarly to BPYPN’s over the last 12 months.

BPYPN's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as MMI (78) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that BPYPN’s stock grew similarly to MMI’s over the last 12 months.

MMI's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for BPYPN (100) in the null industry. This means that MMI’s stock grew significantly faster than BPYPN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPYPNMMI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPYPN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MMI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSZIX17.400.03
+0.17%
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Z
PWTYX52.790.05
+0.09%
UBS US Allocation P
PCGRX24.530.02
+0.08%
Victory Pioneer Mid Cap Value A
FSEWX15.47N/A
N/A
Fidelity Sustainable U.S. Eq Z
LAGWX26.20-0.22
-0.83%
Lord Abbett Developing Growth A

BPYPN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPYPN has been loosely correlated with BPYPP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPYPN jumps, then BPYPP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPYPN
1D Price
Change %
BPYPN100%
+0.44%
BPYPP - BPYPN
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
BPYPO - BPYPN
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
MMI - BPYPN
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
JLL - BPYPN
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
NMRK - BPYPN
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
More

MMI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMI has been closely correlated with CWK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MMI jumps, then CWK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMI
1D Price
Change %
MMI100%
-1.08%
CWK - MMI
68%
Closely correlated
N/A
CBRE - MMI
66%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
JLL - MMI
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
NMRK - MMI
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
FRPH - MMI
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
More