BPYPN
Price
$13.58
Change
-$0.22 (-1.59%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
MMI
Price
$29.83
Change
+$0.16 (+0.54%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.16B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPYPN vs MMI

Header iconBPYPN vs MMI Comparison
Open Charts BPYPN vs MMIBanner chart's image
Brookfield Property Partners
Price$13.58
Change-$0.22 (-1.59%)
Volume$11.24K
CapitalizationN/A
Marcus & Millichap
Price$29.83
Change+$0.16 (+0.54%)
Volume$79.61K
Capitalization1.16B
BPYPN vs MMI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPYPN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPYPN vs. MMI commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPYPN is a StrongBuy and MMI is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BPYPN: $13.58 vs. MMI: $29.83)
Brand notoriety: BPYPN and MMI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPYPN: 62% vs. MMI: 68%
Market capitalization -- BPYPN: $0 vs. MMI: $1.16B
BPYPN [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $0. MMI’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPYPN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMMI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPYPN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MMI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MMI is a better buy in the long-term than BPYPN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPYPN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPYPN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MMI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BPYPN and MMI are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BPYPN (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -2.12% price change this week, while MMI (@Real Estate Development) price change was -5.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

MMI is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.47% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPYPN YTD gains are higher at: 18.446 vs. MMI (-20.860). BPYPN has more cash in the bank: 1.7B vs. MMI (75.1M). MMI has less debt than BPYPN: MMI (82.4M) vs BPYPN (51.5B).
BPYPNMMIBPYPN / MMI
CapitalizationN/A1.16B-
EBITDA3.89BN/A-
Gain YTD18.446-20.860-88%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue7.92BN/A-
Total Cash1.7B75.1M2,268%
Total Debt51.5B82.4M62,500%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MMI: Fundamental Ratings
MMI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
55
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
21

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPYPNMMI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPYPN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TLOFX10.030.07
+0.70%
Transamerica Large Value Opps R4
VCGAX36.270.25
+0.69%
VALIC Company I Systematic Core Fund
NRMGX19.540.13
+0.67%
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth R6
BGGIX12.090.06
+0.50%
William Blair Global Leaders R6
OGLCX81.590.15
+0.18%
Invesco Global C

BPYPN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPYPN has been loosely correlated with BPYPP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPYPN jumps, then BPYPP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPYPN
1D Price
Change %
BPYPN100%
-1.59%
BPYPP - BPYPN
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
BPYPO - BPYPN
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
NMRK - BPYPN
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
RMR - BPYPN
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
MMI - BPYPN
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
More

MMI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMI has been closely correlated with CWK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MMI jumps, then CWK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMI
1D Price
Change %
MMI100%
+0.54%
CWK - MMI
70%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
CBRE - MMI
69%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
NMRK - MMI
68%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
JLL - MMI
66%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
CIGI - MMI
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
More