BPYPN
Price
$13.52
Change
+$0.02 (+0.15%)
Updated
Jan 15, 10:46 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CBRE
Price
$167.28
Change
+$2.37 (+1.44%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:16 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
49.07B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPYPN vs CBRE

Header iconBPYPN vs CBRE Comparison
Open Charts BPYPN vs CBREBanner chart's image
Brookfield Property Partners
Price$13.52
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
Cbre Group
Price$167.28
Change+$2.37 (+1.44%)
Volume$300
Capitalization49.07B
BPYPN vs CBRE Comparison Chart in %
BPYPN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CBRE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPYPN vs. CBRE commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPYPN is a Hold and CBRE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (BPYPN: $13.50 vs. CBRE: $164.90)
Brand notoriety: BPYPN and CBRE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPYPN: 198% vs. CBRE: 113%
Market capitalization -- BPYPN: $0 vs. CBRE: $49.07B
BPYPN [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $0. CBRE’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $49.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPYPN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCBRE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPYPN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CBRE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBRE is a better buy in the long-term than BPYPN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPYPN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CBRE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPYPN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CBRE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBRE is a better buy in the short-term than BPYPN.

Price Growth

BPYPN (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +0.37% price change this week, while CBRE (@Real Estate Development) price change was -0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBRE is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+1.19% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBRE YTD gains are higher at: 2.556 vs. BPYPN (1.503). BPYPN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.61B vs. CBRE (2.27B). BPYPN has more cash in the bank: 1.82B vs. CBRE (1.67B). CBRE has less debt than BPYPN: CBRE (9.48B) vs BPYPN (50.4B). CBRE has higher revenues than BPYPN: CBRE (39.3B) vs BPYPN (7.2B).
BPYPNCBREBPYPN / CBRE
CapitalizationN/A49.1B-
EBITDA3.61B2.27B159%
Gain YTD1.5032.55659%
P/E RatioN/A40.82-
Revenue7.2B39.3B18%
Total Cash1.82B1.67B109%
Total Debt50.4B9.48B532%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPYPN vs CBRE: Fundamental Ratings
BPYPN
CBRE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5471
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10019
SMR RATING
1..100
10056
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5425
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10051
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPYPN's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBRE (88) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that BPYPN’s stock grew significantly faster than CBRE’s over the last 12 months.

CBRE's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for BPYPN (100) in the null industry. This means that CBRE’s stock grew significantly faster than BPYPN’s over the last 12 months.

CBRE's SMR Rating (56) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPYPN (100) in the null industry. This means that CBRE’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPYPN’s over the last 12 months.

CBRE's Price Growth Rating (25) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as BPYPN (54) in the null industry. This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to BPYPN’s over the last 12 months.

CBRE's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPYPN (100) in the null industry. This means that CBRE’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPYPN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPYPNCBRE
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPYPN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CBRE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ANDE57.821.18
+2.08%
Andersons
MIRA1.480.02
+1.37%
MIRA Pharmaceuticals
COKE152.240.27
+0.18%
Coca-Cola Consolidated Inc
BNTC12.13-0.17
-1.38%
Benitec Biopharma
CCCXU20.14-1.07
-5.02%
Churchill Capital Corp

BPYPN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPYPN has been loosely correlated with BPYPP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPYPN jumps, then BPYPP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPYPN
1D Price
Change %
BPYPN100%
-0.37%
BPYPP - BPYPN
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
BPYPO - BPYPN
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
MMI - BPYPN
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
JLL - BPYPN
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
CBRE - BPYPN
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
More

CBRE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBRE has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBRE jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBRE
1D Price
Change %
CBRE100%
+0.12%
JLL - CBRE
92%
Closely correlated
-1.70%
CWK - CBRE
82%
Closely correlated
-1.74%
CIGI - CBRE
80%
Closely correlated
-0.40%
NMRK - CBRE
80%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
MMI - CBRE
67%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
More