BPYPM
Price
$15.23
Change
-$0.02 (-0.13%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
OXLCO
Price
$23.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPYPM vs OXLCO

Header iconBPYPM vs OXLCO Comparison
Open Charts BPYPM vs OXLCOBanner chart's image
Brookfield Property Partners
Price$15.23
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
Volume$6.42K
CapitalizationN/A
Oxford Lane Capital
Price$23.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.24K
CapitalizationN/A
BPYPM vs OXLCO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPYPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OXLCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPYPM vs. OXLCO commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPYPM is a Hold and OXLCO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BPYPM: $15.23 vs. OXLCO: $23.20)
Brand notoriety: BPYPM and OXLCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPYPM: 46% vs. OXLCO: 54%
Market capitalization -- BPYPM: $0 vs. OXLCO: $0
BPYPM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. OXLCO’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPYPM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOXLCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BPYPM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OXLCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OXLCO is a better buy in the long-term than BPYPM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPYPM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OXLCO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPYPM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OXLCO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPYPM is a better buy in the short-term than OXLCO.

Price Growth

BPYPM (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OXLCO (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.61% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OXLCO YTD gains are higher at: 6.009 vs. BPYPM (4.003).
BPYPMOXLCOBPYPM / OXLCO
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.0036.00967%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A142M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A195M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OXLCO: Fundamental Ratings
OXLCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
94
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
36

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPYPMOXLCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
12%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
17%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
5%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
8%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPYPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OXLCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REN.X0.0106380.000775
+7.86%
Ren cryptocurrency
CIEN88.601.41
+1.62%
Ciena Corp
HHS3.41N/A
N/A
Harte Hanks
JANX25.96-0.01
-0.04%
Janux Therapeutics
RCKT3.14-0.07
-2.18%
Rocket Pharmaceuticals

BPYPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPYPM has been loosely correlated with NTRSO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPYPM jumps, then NTRSO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPYPM
1D Price
Change %
BPYPM100%
-0.13%
NTRSO - BPYPM
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
OXLCO - BPYPM
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CCIA - BPYPM
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
EICB - BPYPM
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SII - BPYPM
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
More

OXLCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OXLCO has been loosely correlated with EICB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OXLCO jumps, then EICB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OXLCO
1D Price
Change %
OXLCO100%
N/A
EICB - OXLCO
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OCCIN - OXLCO
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
OCCIO - OXLCO
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
NMFC - OXLCO
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
NTRS - OXLCO
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
More