Advertisement
BPYPM vs EICB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPYPM is a Hold and EICB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BPYPM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEICB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BPYPM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- EICB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BPYPM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EICB’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BPYPM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- EICB’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
BPYPM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.03% price change this week, while EICB (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| BPYPM | EICB | BPYPM / EICB | |
| Capitalization | N/A | N/A | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.461 | 4.254 | 152% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 33.1M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
| BPYPM | EICB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 6% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 10% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | N/A |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | N/A |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 54% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 54% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 14% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | N/A |
Advertisement
BPYPM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPYPM has been loosely correlated with NTRSO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPYPM jumps, then NTRSO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BPYPM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPYPM | 100% | -0.45% | ||
| NTRSO - BPYPM | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| OXLCO - BPYPM | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| CCIA - BPYPM | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.39% | ||
| EICB - BPYPM | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
| SII - BPYPM | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.24% | ||
More | ||||
EICB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EICB has been closely correlated with OXLCP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EICB jumps, then OXLCP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EICB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EICB | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| OXLCP - EICB | 71% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| OCCIN - EICB | 68% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| OXLCO - EICB | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| EICA - EICB | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| ECCC - EICB | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||