BPYPM
Price
$15.93
Change
+$0.30 (+1.92%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
CCIA
Price
$25.43
Change
-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPYPM vs CCIA

Header iconBPYPM vs CCIA Comparison
Open Charts BPYPM vs CCIABanner chart's image
Brookfield Property Partners
Price$15.93
Change+$0.30 (+1.92%)
Volume$19.53K
CapitalizationN/A
Carlyle Credit Income Fund
Price$25.43
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Volume$2.83K
CapitalizationN/A
BPYPM vs CCIA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPYPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPYPM vs. CCIA commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPYPM is a StrongBuy and CCIA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BPYPM: $15.93 vs. CCIA: $25.42)
Brand notoriety: BPYPM and CCIA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPYPM: 120% vs. CCIA: 51%
Market capitalization -- BPYPM: $0 vs. CCIA: $0
BPYPM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. CCIA’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPYPM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCCIA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BPYPM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CCIA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BPYPM and CCIA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPYPM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CCIA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPYPM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CCIA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPYPM is a better buy in the short-term than CCIA.

Price Growth

BPYPM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.99% price change this week, while CCIA (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPYPM YTD gains are higher at: 11.557 vs. CCIA (4.383).
BPYPMCCIABPYPM / CCIA
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.5574.383264%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A2.24M-
Total DebtN/A3.48M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPYPMCCIA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
13%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
4%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
2%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
14%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
10%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPYPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ENVX9.190.17
+1.88%
Enovix Corp
EPAM169.461.37
+0.82%
Epam Systems
GPATU10.66N/A
N/A
GP-Act III Acquisition Corp
TBN21.73-0.27
-1.23%
Tamboran Resources Corp.
WFCF12.27-0.21
-1.68%
Where Food Comes From

BPYPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPYPM has been loosely correlated with NTRSO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPYPM jumps, then NTRSO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPYPM
1D Price
Change %
BPYPM100%
+1.93%
NTRSO - BPYPM
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
OXLCO - BPYPM
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
GSBD - BPYPM
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
CCIA - BPYPM
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
BLK - BPYPM
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
More

CCIA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCIA has been closely correlated with OXLCP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCIA jumps, then OXLCP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCIA
1D Price
Change %
CCIA100%
-0.10%
OXLCP - CCIA
66%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
OCCIN - CCIA
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
OXLCN - CCIA
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
EICA - CCIA
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
OXLCO - CCIA
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
More