BPXXY
Price
$18.75
Change
+$0.67 (+3.71%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
4.91B
LRCDF
Price
$23.60
Change
+$0.87 (+3.83%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPXXY vs LRCDF

Header iconBPXXY vs LRCDF Comparison
Open Charts BPXXY vs LRCDFBanner chart's image
BPER BANCA S.P.A
Price$18.75
Change+$0.67 (+3.71%)
Volume$110
Capitalization4.91B
Laurentian Bank of Canada
Price$23.60
Change+$0.87 (+3.83%)
Volume$122
Capitalization1.3B
BPXXY vs LRCDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPXXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPXXY vs. LRCDF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPXXY is a Hold and LRCDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BPXXY: $18.75 vs. LRCDF: $23.60)
Brand notoriety: BPXXY and LRCDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPXXY: 35% vs. LRCDF: 4%
Market capitalization -- BPXXY: $4.91B vs. LRCDF: $1.3B
BPXXY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.91B. LRCDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPXXY’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileLRCDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPXXY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • LRCDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPXXY is a better buy in the long-term than LRCDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPXXY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRCDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPXXY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LRCDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BPXXY and LRCDF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BPXXY (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LRCDF (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPXXY($4.91B) has a higher market cap than LRCDF($1.3B). LRCDF has higher P/E ratio than BPXXY: LRCDF (8.54) vs BPXXY (2.56). BPXXY YTD gains are higher at: 85.191 vs. LRCDF (18.177). BPXXY has less debt than LRCDF: BPXXY (9.91B) vs LRCDF (15.4B). BPXXY has higher revenues than LRCDF: BPXXY (4.74B) vs LRCDF (1.03B).
BPXXYLRCDFBPXXY / LRCDF
Capitalization4.91B1.3B377%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD85.19118.177469%
P/E Ratio2.568.5430%
Revenue4.74B1.03B458%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt9.91B15.4B64%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPXXY vs LRCDF: Fundamental Ratings
BPXXY
LRCDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
591
SMR RATING
1..100
812
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1053
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LRCDF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as BPXXY (33). This means that LRCDF’s stock grew similarly to BPXXY’s over the last 12 months.

BPXXY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LRCDF (91). This means that BPXXY’s stock grew significantly faster than LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

BPXXY's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCDF (12). This means that BPXXY’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

BPXXY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCDF (44). This means that BPXXY’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

BPXXY's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LRCDF (53). This means that BPXXY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPXXYLRCDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPXXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XJR40.860.25
+0.63%
iShares ESG Select Scrn S&P Small-CapETF
RBLD72.380.41
+0.57%
First Trust Alerian US NextGen InfrasETF
DES33.170.17
+0.52%
WisdomTree US SmallCap Dividend ETF
PIZ45.470.02
+0.04%
Invesco DW Developed Markets Momt ETF
KTBA21.65N/A
N/A
Structured Products Corp.

BPXXY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPXXY and NDBKF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPXXY and NDBKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPXXY
1D Price
Change %
BPXXY100%
N/A
NDBKF - BPXXY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HVLM - BPXXY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CKHGY - BPXXY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBNNF - BPXXY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELMA - BPXXY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LRCDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LRCDF and KBCSY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LRCDF and KBCSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRCDF
1D Price
Change %
LRCDF100%
N/A
KBCSY - LRCDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
BBAJF - LRCDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPXXF - LRCDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPXXY - LRCDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNBBY - LRCDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
More