BPXXY
Price
$19.04
Change
+$0.28 (+1.49%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
4.91B
ELMA
Price
$21.75
Change
+$0.40 (+1.87%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
15.05M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPXXY vs ELMA

Header iconBPXXY vs ELMA Comparison
Open Charts BPXXY vs ELMABanner chart's image
BPER BANCA S.P.A
Price$19.04
Change+$0.28 (+1.49%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization4.91B
Elmer Ban
Price$21.75
Change+$0.40 (+1.87%)
Volume$203
Capitalization15.05M
BPXXY vs ELMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPXXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ELMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPXXY vs. ELMA commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPXXY is a Buy and ELMA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BPXXY: $19.03 vs. ELMA: $21.75)
Brand notoriety: BPXXY and ELMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPXXY: 300% vs. ELMA: 33%
Market capitalization -- BPXXY: $4.91B vs. ELMA: $15.05M
BPXXY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.91B. ELMA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $15.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPXXY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileELMA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BPXXY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • ELMA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPXXY is a better buy in the long-term than ELMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPXXY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ELMA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPXXY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • ELMA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BPXXY and ELMA are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BPXXY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.55% price change this week, while ELMA (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPXXY($4.91B) has a higher market cap than ELMA($15M). BPXXY YTD gains are higher at: 88.056 vs. ELMA (-0.676). ELMA has less debt than BPXXY: ELMA (675K) vs BPXXY (9.91B). BPXXY has higher revenues than ELMA: BPXXY (4.74B) vs ELMA (10.3M).
BPXXYELMABPXXY / ELMA
Capitalization4.91B15M32,707%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD88.056-0.676-13,033%
P/E Ratio2.56N/A-
Revenue4.74B10.3M45,981%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt9.91B675K1,467,556%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPXXY vs ELMA: Fundamental Ratings
BPXXY
ELMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
517
SMR RATING
1..100
78
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3853
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
961
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a29

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ELMA's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as BPXXY (36). This means that ELMA’s stock grew similarly to BPXXY’s over the last 12 months.

BPXXY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as ELMA (17). This means that BPXXY’s stock grew similarly to ELMA’s over the last 12 months.

BPXXY's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as ELMA (8). This means that BPXXY’s stock grew similarly to ELMA’s over the last 12 months.

BPXXY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as ELMA (53). This means that BPXXY’s stock grew similarly to ELMA’s over the last 12 months.

BPXXY's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ELMA (61). This means that BPXXY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ELMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPXXYELMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPXXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ELMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QMOM63.880.38
+0.61%
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF
FDLS32.140.12
+0.39%
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF
TIPX19.12N/A
N/A
SPDR® Blmbg 1-10 Year TIPS ETF
QNXT26.85-0.02
-0.08%
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
INDF38.96-0.13
-0.33%
Range India Financials ETF

BPXXY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPXXY and NDBKF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPXXY and NDBKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPXXY
1D Price
Change %
BPXXY100%
+1.55%
NDBKF - BPXXY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HVLM - BPXXY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CKHGY - BPXXY
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
PBNNF - BPXXY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELMA - BPXXY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ELMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ELMA and MIFF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELMA and MIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELMA
1D Price
Change %
ELMA100%
N/A
MIFF - ELMA
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBFS - ELMA
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
KFFB - ELMA
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
PGNN - ELMA
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPXXY - ELMA
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
More