Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPTRX vs RGAHX
BPTRX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts BPTRX vs RGAHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$83.30
Change+$0.28 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
BPTRX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPTRX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPTRX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. BPTRX (7.32B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than BPTRX: RGAHX (0.47) vs BPTRX (0.00). BPTRX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: BPTRX (22 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). BPTRX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BPTRX (1.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPTRX: RGAHX (250) vs BPTRX (2000). BPTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.05 vs. RGAHX (17.89). BPTRX return over 5 years is better than : 115.64 vs. RGAHX (49.57).
| BPTRX | RGAHX | BPTRX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 0.44 | 509% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 0.44 | 509% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.230 | 13.426 | -32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.32B | 328B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.05 | 17.89 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.32 | 58.90 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 115.64 | 49.57 | 233% |
| Returns for 10 years | 419.59 | N/A | - |