Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPTIX vs RGAHX
BPTIX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts BPTIX vs RGAHX
Baron Partners Institutional
Price$213.20
Change+$1.09 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.43B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$84.93
Change+$0.88 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
BPTIX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPTIX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPTIX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. BPTIX (7.43B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than BPTIX: RGAHX (0.46) vs BPTIX (0.00). BPTIX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: BPTIX (16 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). BPTIX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BPTIX (1.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPTIX: RGAHX (250) vs BPTIX (1000000). BPTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.41 vs. RGAHX (18.60). BPTIX return over 5 years is better than : 79.07 vs. RGAHX (42.94).
| BPTIX | RGAHX | BPTIX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.44 | 452% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.44 | 452% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.461 | 15.918 | -9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.43B | 332B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.41 | 18.60 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.03 | 60.57 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.07 | 42.94 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 489.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement