BPT
Price
$0.51
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 30, 04:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
52M
MARPS
Price
$4.53
Change
+$0.12 (+2.72%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
8.24M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPT vs MARPS

Header iconBPT vs MARPS Comparison
Open Charts BPT vs MARPSBanner chart's image
BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust
Price$0.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$448
Capitalization52M
Marine Petroleum Trust
Price$4.53
Change+$0.12 (+2.72%)
Volume$47.61K
Capitalization8.24M
BPT vs MARPS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MARPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPT vs. MARPS commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPT is a Buy and MARPS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (BPT: $0.50 vs. MARPS: $4.53)
Brand notoriety: BPT and MARPS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPT: 42% vs. MARPS: 41%
Market capitalization -- BPT: $52M vs. MARPS: $8.24M
BPT [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $52M. MARPS’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $8.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $76.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $10.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMARPS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MARPS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MARPS is a better buy in the long-term than BPT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MARPS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MARPS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MARPS is a better buy in the short-term than BPT.

Price Growth

BPT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -8.51% price change this week, while MARPS (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -13.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +2.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+2.58% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPT($52M) has a higher market cap than MARPS($8.24M). BPT (9.55) and MARPS (9.51) have similar P/E ratio . MARPS YTD gains are higher at: 19.637 vs. BPT (-5.515). BPT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.31M vs. MARPS (849K). BPT has more cash in the bank: 5.3M vs. MARPS (994K). BPT has higher revenues than MARPS: BPT (6.64M) vs MARPS (1.13M).
BPTMARPSBPT / MARPS
Capitalization52M8.24M631%
EBITDA5.31M849K626%
Gain YTD-5.51519.637-28%
P/E Ratio9.559.51100%
Revenue6.64M1.13M588%
Total Cash5.3M994K533%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPT vs MARPS: Fundamental Ratings
BPT
MARPS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10069
SMR RATING
1..100
9715
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8942
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
228
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPT's Valuation (14) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MARPS (42) in the null industry. This means that BPT’s stock grew similarly to MARPS’s over the last 12 months.

MARPS's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as BPT (100) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that MARPS’s stock grew similarly to BPT’s over the last 12 months.

MARPS's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BPT (97) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that MARPS’s stock grew significantly faster than BPT’s over the last 12 months.

MARPS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPT (89) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that MARPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPT’s over the last 12 months.

BPT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MARPS (28) in the null industry. This means that BPT’s stock grew similarly to MARPS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPTMARPS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
80%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MARPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRAW1.480.05
+3.50%
Traws Pharma Inc
CWT45.480.01
+0.02%
California Water Service
CLCO6.70-0.04
-0.59%
Cool Company Ltd
BW0.96-0.01
-0.63%
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises
ENPH39.65-1.23
-3.01%
Enphase Energy

BPT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPT and DHT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPT and DHT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPT
1D Price
Change %
BPT100%
+2.59%
DHT - BPT
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
WMB - BPT
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
GLNG - BPT
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
STNG - BPT
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
FRO - BPT
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
More

MARPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MARPS and BPT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MARPS and BPT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MARPS
1D Price
Change %
MARPS100%
+2.61%
BPT - MARPS
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
CMBT - MARPS
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
IMPP - MARPS
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
NGL - MARPS
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
GLNG - MARPS
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
More